Despite its strong reputation for privacy and security globally, Proton VPN fails to provide consistent or reliable service within mainland China due to the sophisticated censorship infrastructure known as the Great Firewall. While the service maintains an anecdotal track record of occasional functionality, Proton VPN’s own support team cannot guarantee connectivity from within China’s borders, and the company has been actively blocked by Chinese authorities since September 2019. This comprehensive analysis examines the technical mechanisms behind China’s internet censorship system, explores why Proton VPN specifically struggles against these barriers, evaluates real-world testing results, and identifies alternative VPN solutions that demonstrate greater resilience to Chinese censorship measures.
Understanding China’s Great Firewall: The Technical Architecture of Internet Censorship
China’s internet censorship system, colloquially known as the Great Firewall, represents the most sophisticated and extensive government censorship infrastructure ever deployed on a national scale. Rather than operating as a single monolithic system, the Great Firewall employs a multi-layered approach that operates across different levels of the internet’s technical stack, making circumvention extraordinarily difficult for any single technology to consistently overcome. The system manages access for approximately 700 million internet users—roughly a quarter of all internet users globally—and has evolved significantly over the past two decades to become increasingly intelligent and adaptive in its blocking mechanisms.
At the foundational DNS level, the Great Firewall implements widespread DNS poisoning and spoofing techniques that manipulate DNS caches to contain incorrect IP addresses for blocked domains. When users attempt to access a censored website, their DNS queries are intercepted and redirected to incorrect IP addresses, preventing them from reaching their intended destination. This technique proves particularly challenging for site reliability engineers and network administrators because DNS resolution failures often appear as standard network connectivity issues rather than deliberate blocking, complicating troubleshooting efforts. The system also implements comprehensive IP address blocking that prevents access to specific IP ranges regardless of what domain name users employ to access them. This IP-based blocking has become increasingly sophisticated since 2022, with the firewall now capable of blocking direct IP access even when DNS resolution has been successfully circumvented through alternative means, fundamentally undermining many technical workarounds that previously proved effective.
Beyond these fundamental network layer mechanisms, the Great Firewall performs sophisticated deep packet inspection (DPI) on both encrypted and unencrypted traffic. Deep packet inspection allows the system to analyze packet contents and patterns without needing to decrypt encrypted data, which represents a critical advancement in the system’s capabilities. For unencrypted traffic, the firewall can directly monitor and analyze content, easily extracting sensitive information such as website content, passwords, and email attachments. For encrypted traffic using HTTPS protocols, which comprises most modern internet traffic, the system employs sophisticated DPI techniques that extract potentially damaging metadata, such as who is connecting to which website or service and when, without necessarily being able to access the encrypted content itself.
The system also implements URL filtering through transparent proxies that scan URLs, HTTP headers, and the HTTPS Server Name Indication (SNI) for banned keywords. By examining the SNI field in TLS handshakes—the initial negotiation that establishes encrypted connections—Chinese authorities can identify and block connections to specific domains without needing to decrypt the traffic itself. Additionally, the Chinese government can employ TCP reset attacks through which government cyberpolice inject forged TCP packets designed to send end-of-connection requests to blocklisted servers. These TCP reset attacks appear to originate from the same infrastructure responsible for deep packet inspection, creating a coordinated blocking system that proves difficult to work around through conventional technical means.
More recent developments have expanded the Great Firewall’s capabilities to include blocking of QUIC traffic, the next-generation internet protocol that powers HTTP/3. Since April 2024, the system has been decrypting QUIC Initial packets at scale and applying heuristic filtering rules to block QUIC connections to specific domains. This represents an evolution of the system’s technical sophistication, demonstrating that China’s censorship infrastructure continuously adapts to new technologies as they emerge.
The Chinese government additionally blocks access to VPN applications at the source by preventing downloads through official channels. All access to websites offering ways to bypass the Great Firewall—such as VPN providers and the Tor Project—remains blocked. Google services are comprehensively blocked, including the Google Play Store, preventing Android users from downloading VPN applications through official channels. While the Apple App Store remains technically accessible from within China, Apple complied with Chinese government demands in 2017 to remove all major international VPN applications from its Chinese marketplace. Chinese users must instead rely on domestic app stores such as Tencent MyApp or Baidu Mobile Assistant, which typically contain applications of questionable provenance with no reliable international VPN options available through official distribution channels.
Proton VPN’s Technical Architecture and Security Features
Proton VPN, developed by the team behind ProtonMail at Switzerland-based Proton AG, represents one of the most privacy-focused VPN services available globally, designed from inception with emphasis on user privacy and freedom of access. The service employs strong encryption standards throughout its infrastructure, utilizing AES-256 encryption for the encrypted tunnel between a user’s computer and Proton VPN servers, which successfully prevents adversaries with control over internet connections from eavesdropping on traffic. The service implements multiple VPN protocols including WireGuard and OpenVPN, both of which employ proven open-source encryption standards implemented at their strongest settings.
Proton VPN’s security architecture includes several advanced features specifically designed to protect user privacy and prevent data leakage. The service maintains a strict no-logs policy that has been independently audited by Securitum, meaning the company does not retain records of which websites users visit, what data they transfer, or what applications they use while connected to Proton VPN servers. The company stores only a single timestamp representing the most recent account login, which gets overwritten with each subsequent successful login, ensuring minimal data retention. The service offers multiple layers of protection including DNS leak protection and IPv6 leak protection, ensuring that user browsing history is never leaked to internet service providers through DNS queries or IPv6 connections.
Proton VPN’s free plan, which distinguishes itself from most competitors by offering unlimited data and no artificial speed restrictions, provides access to servers in the Netherlands, Japan, Romania, Poland, the United States, Mexico, Canada, Switzerland, Norway, and Singapore. The paid plan offers access to over 15,000 servers across 120 countries, providing extensive geographic distribution. The service includes several advanced anti-censorship features, including the Stealth protocol—a custom obfuscation VPN protocol based on WireGuard tunneled over TLS that disguises VPN traffic to resemble standard internet traffic. The service also offers Smart Protocol, which intelligently probes networks to discover the best VPN protocol configuration needed for optimal performance or to bypass censorship, and Alternative routing, which helps defeat censorship by routing connections through third-party networks such as AWS when access to Proton servers is blocked.
However, Proton VPN explicitly acknowledges the theoretical limits of VPN technology against sophisticated censorship systems. The service recognizes that while VPNs can effectively prevent many forms of censorship, sophisticated censorship programs like the Great Firewall can ALWAYS block VPN traffic if they choose to do so, because VPN connections, like the rest of the internet, are established over TCP/IP, meaning adversaries can simply block connections to known VPN server IP addresses. This fundamental technical limitation means that even the most sophisticated VPN protocols cannot guarantee successful circumvention of state-level censorship infrastructure designed specifically to prevent VPN usage.
Why Proton VPN Fails in China: The Specific Technical and Political Barriers
Proton VPN faces extraordinary challenges in China due to the country’s sophisticated firewall, which controls and restricts internet access through various technical methods including DNS filtering, URL filtering, and deep packet inspection to restrict access to social media, news, and messaging apps and sites. The firewall also detects and blocks access to many VPN servers and IP addresses with remarkable effectiveness. Despite Proton VPN featuring obfuscation technology designed to disguise VPN traffic and bypass censorship of this type, the restrictions in China prove particularly stringent.
The timeline of Proton VPN’s blocking in China demonstrates the political dimension of this challenge. As of September 18, 2019, the Chinese government officially included Proton VPN in its blocklist as part of a larger crackdown on internet freedom and VPN services. Following this designation, the Proton VPN website became inaccessible from within China, and users cannot purchase subscriptions from within the country. This blocking represents a deliberate government policy to prevent citizens from accessing tools for circumventing the Great Firewall, reflecting broader efforts to consolidate control over information and limit access to foreign perspectives.
Connecting from major Chinese cities including Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangzhou has historically proven to be hit-or-miss with Proton VPN, with connections working inconsistently even when using obfuscation technologies. The service performs particularly poorly during periods of heightened political sensitivity or government crackdowns on internet freedom. Real-world testing conducted by independent VPN review organizations demonstrates this unreliability: when researchers tested 28 different VPN services across two major Chinese ISP networks in Beijing, only 11 of the 28 VPNs worked on both ISPs tested, and Proton VPN was notably absent from the lists of consistently functioning services.
The Chinese government’s blocking of Proton VPN represents not an isolated targeting of one VPN service but rather part of a comprehensive strategy to suppress unauthorized VPN usage throughout the country. The government has clarified its stance that only government-approved VPNs are technically legal, typically intended for corporate use and obtained from state-owned telecommunications companies. Personal use of unauthorized VPNs remains heavily restricted and actively discouraged through advanced detection methods and the blocking of unapproved services. In January 2017, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced plans to “clean up and regulate” the internet market, which served as the legal basis for subsequent crackdown operations targeting commercial VPN providers and individuals attempting to use unauthorized VPN services.
The 2019 Blocklist and Escalating Restrictions on VPN Services
The decision to officially blocklist Proton VPN in September 2019 marked a significant escalation in China’s efforts to suppress VPN usage among both individuals and businesses. This action occurred within the broader context of increased government efforts to block unapproved VPN services, reflecting the Chinese Communist Party’s determination to maintain strict control over information flows and prevent citizens from accessing uncensored foreign content. The timing coincided with other government measures to tighten digital controls and reinforce the Great Firewall’s effectiveness against circumvention attempts.
Prior to 2019, there existed a more ambiguous “gray area” regarding personal VPN usage in China. While technically unauthorized, the government primarily focused enforcement efforts on VPN providers and commercial entities rather than individual users. An informal understanding existed between the government and citizens that individuals could bypass the Great Firewall for personal purposes—such as accessing social media or foreign news—as long as they did not directly challenge state authority or engage in politically sensitive activities. However, the 2019 crackdown fundamentally altered this tacit arrangement, shifting from a focus on VPN providers to active enforcement against individual users attempting to access unapproved VPN services.
The Chinese government’s export of censorship technology further demonstrates its commitment to suppressing VPN usage globally, not merely domestically. Leaked documents revealed that a company called Geedge Networks, co-founded by Fang Binxing—famously known as the “Father of the Great Firewall”—has been exporting advanced Great Firewall censorship technologies to authoritarian governments worldwide, including Kazakhstan, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Myanmar, and other countries. The company offers a sophisticated mass censorship tool called Tiangou Secure Gateway (TSG) that can be readily deployed at scale within national datacenters. These exported systems include capabilities to monitor and analyze unencrypted traffic, employ deep packet inspection on HTTPS traffic, and maintain lists of VPN services and known VPN server IP addresses that clients can flag for blocking.
Real-World Testing Results: Proton VPN’s Performance in China
Independent testing conducted by VPN research organizations demonstrates empirically why Proton VPN fails to function reliably in China. One comprehensive study tested 28 different paid VPN services against two Chinese ISP networks in Beijing—Ultra Kings Limited and China Unicom. The testing methodology involved attempting to access 19 different blocked websites while connected to each VPN service, monitoring connection stability, measuring speeds, and testing functionality with messaging applications including WhatsApp, Telegram, Viber, and Skype.
The results proved sobering for users seeking reliable VPN access within China: of the 28 VPNs tested, only 19 worked on Ultra Kings Limited and only 13 worked on China Unicom. Both ISPs blocked the homepage of 26 of the 28 VPN services tested, preventing users from even downloading or updating their VPN applications while in China. Only 11 of the 28 VPNs tested managed to work consistently on both ISPs. Notably, Proton VPN did not rank among the VPNs that successfully bypassed both ISP networks’ restrictions.
In contrast, ExpressVPN emerged as the clear leader in the testing, successfully accessing all 19 blocked test websites on both ISPs tested, with WhatsApp, Telegram, Viber, and Skype working flawlessly on both networks. ExpressVPN maintained download speeds of 2.7Mbps and upload speeds of 2Mbps on Ultra Kings Limited (compared to benchmarks of 3.9Mbps and 3.3Mbps respectively) and achieved 4.28Mbps download and 0.4Mbps upload speeds on China Unicom (versus benchmarks of 5.14Mbps and 0.52Mbps). Other VPNs demonstrating greater reliability than Proton VPN included NordVPN, Surfshark, VyprVPN, and Mullvad, all of which successfully bypassed the Great Firewall with greater consistency than Proton VPN’s unreliable performance.
Multiple independent security research organizations and VPN review sites have reached the same conclusion: Proton VPN does not work reliably in China. When contacted directly, Proton VPN’s own customer support representatives confirmed that users are unlikely to successfully connect to Proton servers from mainland China, effectively validating the testing results and acknowledging the service’s inability to overcome China’s censorship infrastructure.
Obfuscation Technologies: Promise and Limitations in China’s Context
Obfuscation represents a critical technological approach to VPN circumvention, disguising VPN traffic to make it appear as regular internet traffic that firewall systems struggle to detect and block. Multiple obfuscation techniques have been developed and deployed by various VPN providers in attempts to bypass the Great Firewall’s detection capabilities. These techniques include Stealth protocols, Chameleon protocols, domain fronting, port randomization, and other advanced methods designed to hide the fact that a user is employing a VPN connection.
Proton VPN implements Stealth, a custom WireGuard-based VPN protocol that tunnels traffic over TLS to disguise VPN connections as standard HTTPS traffic. While Stealth represents a sophisticated obfuscation approach, the restrictions in China prove particularly stringent against obfuscation attempts. The service acknowledges that its Stealth protocol has limited success against Beijing’s ever-tightening digital controls. Users attempting to enable Stealth on Proton VPN connections in China report significant speed degradation, with some users experiencing up to 68% speed loss after enabling Stealth protocol—essentially rendering the connection too slow for practical use.
The fundamental challenge with all obfuscation technologies lies in the ongoing arms race between censorship developers and circumvention technologists. As researchers from the academic community have documented, the Great Firewall employs multiple detection strategies including DNS pollution and hijacking, IP address and IP range blocking, domain name system filtering, destination IP address blocking, URL filtering, DNS poisoning, TCP reset attacks, and active probing. Each obfuscation technique developed to defeat one detection strategy must be evaluated against all the others. As soon as new obfuscation methods become widely deployed, Chinese authorities analyze traffic patterns, develop countermeasures, and update their blocking systems.
Recent academic research published at USENIX Security 2025 demonstrates how the Great Firewall has adapted to block even encrypted protocols like QUIC, which was designed to overcome previous censorship limitations. Since April 2024, the system has been successfully blocking QUIC traffic to specific domains by decrypting QUIC Initial packets at scale and applying heuristic filtering rules. This advancement demonstrates that the Great Firewall’s technical sophistication continues to evolve, incorporating new detection techniques as emerging technologies appear. No current obfuscation technique has proven capable of consistently bypassing the full scope of the Great Firewall’s detection and blocking mechanisms indefinitely.
Legal Status and Regulatory Framework for VPN Usage in China
The legal status of VPN usage in China occupies an ambiguous gray area that differs from both Western regulatory frameworks and the binary legal categories typically found in other countries. The Chinese government has never explicitly criminalized all VPN usage; instead, it has implemented a regulatory approach distinguishing between government-approved and unauthorized VPN services.
Only government-approved VPNs are technically legal under Chinese law, typically for corporate use and obtained from state-owned telecommunications companies. These approved business VPN services operate under government supervision and share two defining characteristics: nationwide coverage granted by licenses from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and a legal, centralized system allowing businesses to obtain formal, nationwide VPN access that is monitored by authorities. However, obtaining legal VPN access requires accepting three conditions: government oversight and compliance inspection capability, traffic logging for at least six months providing no privacy protection, and using a state-sanctioned provider through a difficult and expensive approval process.
Personal VPN usage exists in a more legally uncertain space. While technically not explicitly illegal in every case, personal use is heavily restricted and actively discouraged through advanced detection methods and blocking of unapproved services. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology requires all VPN service providers to register with authorities, and use of an unregistered VPN can theoretically lead to fines or, in some cases, criminal prosecution. However, enforcement targeting individual users remains relatively rare, with most enforcement efforts directed at VPN service providers and businesses operating unauthorized VPN infrastructure.
Despite this legal uncertainty, residents and visitors continue attempting to circumvent restrictions for work, study, research, and personal communication purposes. The lack of widespread individual prosecutions suggests that authorities prioritize blocking unauthorized VPN services through technical means rather than pursuing criminal cases against individual users, though this enforcement posture could potentially shift if authorities determine a need to increase deterrence.
Troubleshooting Methods: When Proton VPN Users Attempt Connection from China
Despite Proton VPN’s acknowledged unreliability in China, some users with existing subscriptions attempt various troubleshooting steps hoping to establish connections from within the country. These methods occasionally produce temporary success, though they rarely provide consistent or reliable access.
Enabling Stealth protocol represents the first troubleshooting approach most users attempt, as this obfuscation feature disguises VPN traffic as normal HTTPS traffic to avoid VPN blocks. However, as noted previously, Stealth protocol significantly degrades connection speeds and provides only limited protection against the Great Firewall’s sophisticated detection mechanisms. Users report that Stealth may allow occasional connection establishment but does not provide stable, usable internet access for practical purposes like streaming or work-related activities.
Switching VPN protocols constitutes another troubleshooting approach, with users attempting different protocol configurations to identify combinations that might work in their specific network circumstances. Proton VPN supports multiple protocols including OpenVPN TCP, which the company notes can be more reliable than UDP for unstable networks characterized by high packet loss. However, the Great Firewall’s detection of different VPN protocols means that blocking a particular protocol often reflects a deliberate policy rather than a technical limitation, suggesting that protocol switching rarely provides lasting solutions.
Using the Smart Protocol feature, which automatically probes networks to discover the best VPN protocol configuration, represents another attempted workaround. However, if the Great Firewall has blocklisted specific VPN server IP addresses or detected the VPN traffic patterns regardless of protocol, automatic protocol selection cannot overcome these obstacles.
Proton VPN’s Alternative Routing feature, which routes connections through third-party networks such as AWS when direct access to Proton servers is blocked, offers another potential approach for users in censored environments. This system automatically detects when a connection might be subject to censorship and attempts alternative paths to establish connections to Proton servers. However, this method requires using third-party infrastructure not controlled by Proton, and the effectiveness depends on whether the third-party networks themselves are subject to blocking. Additionally, Alternative Routing has not been specifically tested or validated as effective within China’s context.
The reality remains that despite these troubleshooting options, users attempting to use Proton VPN from mainland China face fundamentally limited prospects for successful connection, particularly for sustained, consistent access. While anecdotal reports occasionally emerge of users achieving temporary success through some combination of these methods, such successes prove neither reliable nor consistent enough for practical reliance.
Tor as a More Effective Alternative: Bridging and Pluggable Transports
Recognizing Proton VPN’s limitations in China, multiple sources recommend Tor as the most effective way for people in China to access blocked content, despite Tor’s inherent limitations regarding speed and usability. Tor itself is blocked in mainland China, but the Tor Project has specifically developed mechanisms designed to circumvent this blocking through Tor bridges and pluggable transports.
A Tor bridge represents a special unlisted Tor server that remains unknown to the Chinese government’s blocklists, making it fundamentally more difficult to block through the standard IP address blocking techniques that would otherwise prevent access. Because bridge addresses remain unlisted in publicly available directories, the Great Firewall cannot block them through IP address filtering unless the government first discovers the specific bridge address—a more difficult task than blocking known Tor entry points. Additionally, pluggable transports mask Tor traffic to make it resemble standard internet traffic, providing additional protection against deep packet inspection detection.
The Tor Project maintains a comprehensive Tor bridge guide documenting the setup process for secure Tor connections, including instructions for discovering and configuring private bridges. However, the critical limitation requires users to download Tor before arriving in China, as Tor itself and the Tor Project’s website remain blocked from within the country, preventing users from downloading Tor after crossing the border.
The primary drawback to Tor versus VPN solutions involves speed and usability. Tor tends to be significantly slower than VPN services because traffic passes through multiple volunteer-run nodes around the world before reaching its final destination, with each node performing encryption and decryption operations. This multi-hop approach provides superior anonymity compared to VPNs but comes at the cost of reduced performance, making Tor unsuitable for activities like video streaming, large file downloads, or real-time communication applications like video conferencing.
Alternative VPN Solutions: Services with Greater Reliability in China
Given Proton VPN’s demonstrated unreliability in mainland China, multiple VPN service providers offer substantially greater reliability through more effective obfuscation technologies, faster speeds, and more recent development of China-specific optimization techniques.
ExpressVPN consistently emerges as the top-performing VPN for China across independent testing studies. The service offers obfuscation on all servers and protocols, maintaining some of the fastest speeds on the market even with obfuscation enabled. ExpressVPN’s commitment to staying ahead of Chinese censors involves proactively monitoring its servers for accessibility in China and deploying advanced technology protocols behind the scenes. The service employs domain fronting and other advanced techniques to disguise actual server addresses, making it harder for the Great Firewall to identify and block specific VPN infrastructure. Real-world testing showed ExpressVPN successfully accessing all 19 blocked test websites on both tested Chinese ISPs, with WhatsApp, Telegram, Viber, and Skype working flawlessly on both networks.
NordVPN has significantly improved its China performance and now consistently bypasses the Great Firewall according to recent testing. The service features obfuscated servers and the NordLynx protocol providing excellent performance under China’s restrictive conditions. Testing showed NordVPN delivering 3.5Mbps download and 3.1Mbps upload speeds on Ultra Kings Limited and 4.82Mbps download while maintaining 0.48Mbps upload speeds on China Unicom, retaining over 90% of baseline download speeds.
VyprVPN has significantly improved its China performance since previous testing iterations, now consistently bypassing the Great Firewall according to recent evaluations. The service’s proprietary Chameleon protocol effectively disguises VPN traffic from deep packet inspection, successfully accessing 18 of 19 test websites on both ISPs during testing. VyprVPN delivers 3.2Mbps download and 2.9Mbps upload speeds on Ultra Kings Limited and 4.33Mbps download with 0.47Mbps upload speeds on China Unicom, demonstrating consistent performance across multiple testing sessions.
Surfshark has emerged as one of the most reliable VPNs for China in 2025, successfully bypassing the Great Firewall on both ISPs tested. The service’s NoBorders mode and camouflage technology proved particularly effective at evading detection, successfully accessing all 19 websites in the test suite and working flawlessly with messaging applications. Surfshark maintained impressive speeds of 3.6Mbps download and 3.1Mbps upload on Ultra Kings Limited and delivered 4.58Mbps download while retaining 0.49Mbps upload speeds on China Unicom.
Mullvad VPN consistently demonstrates reliable performance for China access according to multiple independent reviews, working reliably in China with features including Shadowsocks obfuscation technology and two types of kill switches providing protection against IP leaks. The service maintains 87 server locations across 49 countries, allowing users to select various servers from within China for accessing restricted content including streaming sites, social media platforms, and news channels.
Practical Preparation and Usage Guidelines for China VPN Users
For individuals planning to travel to or reside in China, successful VPN usage requires careful advance preparation and understanding of current technical and legal realities. The most critical guideline emphasizes that users must download, install, and configure their chosen VPN before arriving in China, as downloading VPN applications after arrival proves extraordinarily difficult or impossible.
The recommended preparation process involves selecting a VPN service known to work in China (typically ExpressVPN, NordVPN, VyprVPN, or Surfshark based on recent testing), visiting the official website before arrival to download the appropriate application version for one’s device, creating an account with valid payment information, and installing the application on all devices where VPN protection will be needed. Users should enable all security features including kill switches and DNS leak protection before arrival, as these features prove essential for protecting against accidental IP exposure if the VPN connection drops during use.
Upon arrival in China, users face additional constraints regarding purchasing VPN subscriptions. While some payment methods might theoretically work from within China, many payment processors and credit card issuers refuse to process transactions from China due to sanctions, regulatory restrictions, or the unusual transaction characteristics. Users should ensure their subscriptions remain valid for the duration of their stay, as renewing subscriptions while in China can prove impossible if payment processing fails.
For advanced users who forgot to download a VPN before arrival, limited options exist. Some VPN providers, including ExpressVPN, maintain mirror websites with different domain names specifically for Chinese users, accessible through direct email contact with customer support teams. However, this approach depends on the VPN provider’s support team responding with working mirror links and requires time that casual travelers may not possess. Alternative approaches including sideloading VPN applications via APK files or third-party app stores carry greater security risks and remain less reliable than proper advance preparation.
Proton VPN’s Roadmap and Future Developments
Proton VPN has announced ambitious technical developments intended to improve its anti-censorship capabilities and overall performance, documented in the company’s 2025-2026 autumn and winter roadmap. These developments include expansion of free server locations to ten countries worldwide (adding Mexico, Canada, Switzerland, Norway, and Singapore), a new proprietary VPN architecture designed to deliver faster and more reliable applications while improving anti-censorship capabilities, support for Stealth protocol on Linux devices, and robust post-quantum encryption capabilities for future protection.
The most significant development involves a completely new VPN architecture that the company describes as offering “a new generation of VPN possibilities.” This architecture will allow Proton VPN to develop faster and more reliable applications, improve anti-censorship capabilities, deploy new features faster across all applications, offer Stealth support on previously unsupported platforms, and eventually provide post-quantum encryption resistant to future quantum computer threats.
Additionally, Proton VPN has announced a new command-line interface for Linux, providing faster access to VPN protection and automation capabilities without leaving the terminal. While these developments represent meaningful improvements to Proton VPN’s capabilities generally, they do not specifically address the fundamental technical challenge of bypassing China’s Great Firewall, which remains one of the most sophisticated censorship systems globally.
However, Proton VPN’s commitment to anti-censorship development reflects the company’s recognition that censorship represents an ongoing global challenge extending beyond China to include Russia, Iran, Egypt, and other restrictive regimes. The company’s 2024 report documents its “Eyes on Elections” campaign, providing additional free VPN servers in 21 countries for at least two weeks before and after election day, resulting in more than one million people worldwide accessing free and fair internet in the lead-up to elections. This commitment to fighting censorship globally demonstrates that Proton remains actively engaged in developing circumvention technologies, though China’s Great Firewall represents a particularly difficult challenge that may require technologies beyond those currently under development.
Comparative Analysis: Proton VPN Versus Leading China-Compatible Alternatives
Comparing Proton VPN’s features and performance against the VPN services demonstrating greater reliability in China reveals distinct differences in technical approach, obfuscation strategy, and company philosophy regarding censorship resistance. While Proton VPN excels in privacy protection, open-source code transparency, and global accessibility through its generous free plan, it fundamentally underperforms in the specific context of Great Firewall circumvention compared to services like ExpressVPN, NordVPN, and VyprVPN that have specifically optimized their infrastructure and protocols for China’s unique censorship environment.
Proton VPN’s approach prioritizes privacy and security globally while acknowledging explicit limitations regarding sophisticated state-level censorship. The service’s threat model documentation openly states that sophisticated censorship programs like the Great Firewall can ALWAYS block VPN traffic if they choose to do so, because VPN connections operate over TCP/IP and can thus be blocked by simply targeting known VPN server IP addresses. This frank acknowledgment of technical limitations contrasts with some competitors’ marketing claims implying capability to circumvent any censorship system.
In contrast, ExpressVPN, NordVPN, and other services with demonstrated China functionality prioritize solving the China-specific problem through continuous server monitoring, rapid IP address rotation to prevent blocklisting, and sophisticated obfuscation technologies implemented across their entire server networks rather than as optional features. These services maintain infrastructure specifically optimized for China connections and employ security researchers dedicated to understanding and defeating the Great Firewall’s detection mechanisms. The trade-off involves reduced emphasis on some privacy features that Proton VPN prioritizes, with these services maintaining varying levels of server logging and implementing different privacy policies than Proton VPN’s strict no-logs approach.
The Verdict on Proton VPN in China
The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that Proton VPN does not provide reliable VPN access from within mainland China in 2025, despite the service’s strong global reputation for privacy and security. The Chinese government’s official blocklist designation since September 2019, the service’s inability to guarantee connectivity, real-world testing showing inconsistent performance, and direct confirmation from Proton’s own customer support representatives establish definitively that Proton VPN should not be considered a viable solution for individuals requiring consistent VPN access within China.
For individuals planning travel to or residence in China who require VPN access for legitimate purposes including accessing family communications, conducting international business, or maintaining professional productivity, the evidence indicates that ExpressVPN, NordVPN, VyprVPN, or Surfshark provide substantially greater reliability based on recent independent testing and real-world performance data. These services have specifically optimized their infrastructure and protocols for circumventing the Great Firewall, maintain proactive server monitoring systems, and employ security researchers focused on the China-specific censorship challenge.
The fundamental technical reality remains that no VPN service can guarantee indefinite circumvention of the Great Firewall. As the system continues evolving with new detection mechanisms like QUIC blocking implemented since April 2024, VPN providers must continuously adapt their technologies and server infrastructure to maintain effectiveness. For users requiring the absolute maximum anonymity and freedom from any potential surveillance, Tor bridges represent the most effective option despite slower speeds, though Tor also requires advance downloading before arrival in China due to the blocking of the Tor Project’s website from within the country.
Users selecting any VPN service for use in China should recognize that effectiveness remains variable based on specific ISP networks, geographic location within China, and timing relative to government policy changes or enhanced enforcement periods. Multiple security researchers note that the Great Firewall sometimes blocks VPN servers unpredictably during times of social unrest or international conflict, meaning that VPN services working reliably during one period may face disruptions during subsequent periods.
The ongoing battle between Chinese censorship infrastructure and circumvention technologists reflects a broader global tension between government desires to control information flows and individual desires for freedom of access to information. While technological solutions like obfuscation protocols and alternative routing systems continue advancing, the Great Firewall’s continuous evolution and massive resource allocation suggest that no permanent technological solution will overcome all blocking mechanisms indefinitely. Instead, users must approach VPN usage in China with realistic expectations regarding reliability, maintain contingency plans including multiple VPN subscriptions and alternative connection methods, and prepare thoroughly before arrival given the severe limitations on downloading or configuring VPN services after crossing into Chinese territory.
Protect Your Digital Life with Activate Security
Get 14 powerful security tools in one comprehensive suite. VPN, antivirus, password manager, dark web monitoring, and more.
Get Protected Now
