Brave Software’s built-in virtual private network service, branded as Brave Firewall + VPN and powered by Guardian infrastructure, represents a significant evolution in the privacy-focused browser ecosystem since its initial launch in 2020. As of October 2024, Brave has substantially upgraded its VPN offering with expanded server infrastructure across more than forty countries, enhanced device coverage supporting up to ten simultaneous connections, streamlined geographic selection capabilities, and completed independent security audits verifying its strict no-logs policy. The service combines traditional VPN encryption functionality with firewall-level protections across entire devices, positioning itself as a comprehensive network security solution accessible directly within the Brave browser interface without requiring separate application downloads. However, while Brave’s VPN demonstrates strong privacy fundamentals and integration advantages, it faces competitive challenges from established VPN providers regarding server network scale, protocol flexibility, and geographic coverage limitations that merit careful consideration for users evaluating their privacy and security needs.
The Development and Evolution of Brave’s VPN Service
Initial Launch and Market Positioning
Brave Software introduced its VPN service in 2020 as part of its broader privacy-first browser ecosystem, recognizing that browser-level protections alone were insufficient for comprehensive user privacy. The service was initially available exclusively on mobile platforms for Android and iOS, where it gained traction among Brave’s growing user base of over seventy million users by the time of the October 2024 announcement. Since its inception, Brave Firewall + VPN has become the company’s most popular premium feature, demonstrating consistent exponential growth with thousands of new users adopting the service daily according to official company statements.
The decision to integrate a VPN directly into the Brave browser represented a strategic departure from the traditional VPN market model where users typically downloaded separate applications. This architectural choice reflected Brave’s philosophy of providing privacy and security features that users could access seamlessly without navigating between multiple applications or managing complicated setup processes. The integrated approach meant that existing Brave users could activate VPN protection without downloading additional software, reducing friction in the adoption process and leveraging the browser’s existing user interface and authentication systems. As Brave expanded its browser ecosystem to include features like Brave Search, Brave Rewards, and Brave Leo AI assistant, the VPN service fit naturally into a comprehensive privacy-and-security-focused product suite.
Desktop Expansion and Recent Updates
For several years following its mobile launch, Brave VPN remained exclusive to Android and iOS users, limiting its appeal to computer users seeking integrated privacy solutions. This changed in 2023 when Brave began rolling out VPN capabilities to desktop users running Windows and macOS, initially through controlled deployments using experimental browser flags before transitioning to more widespread availability. The desktop expansion marked a critical milestone in the service’s development, as it enabled users to maintain consistent privacy protections across their entire device ecosystem. In March 2023, Brave introduced cross-device subscription functionality, allowing a single VPN subscription to cover up to five devices regardless of operating system, fundamentally changing the value proposition for families and multi-device users.
The October 30, 2024 announcement represented the most substantial update to the VPN service since its inception, introducing a raft of improvements designed to address competitive gaps and enhance user experience. These updates included the expansion of server infrastructure from hundreds of locations to specifically hundreds of new servers across more than forty countries and regions, a redesigned account portal featuring improved subscription management interfaces, and most significantly, a doubling of device coverage from five to ten simultaneous connections at no increase in pricing. Additionally, users gained the ability to select VPN servers at the city level rather than only at the country level, providing more granular control over their connection routing. The completion of phase two of independent security audits by Sweden-based Assured Security Consultants represented another substantial development, providing third-party verification of Brave’s no-logs claims and infrastructure security practices.
Architectural Design and Technical Specifications
Partnership with Guardian Infrastructure
Rather than developing and operating its own VPN infrastructure independently, Brave entered into a strategic partnership with Guardian, a specialized VPN and firewall technology provider originally designed by iOS security researchers. This partnership arrangement means that Brave leverages Guardian’s existing infrastructure of state-of-the-art VPN servers while Brave’s engineering team focuses on browser integration, user experience, and overall platform security. Guardian’s infrastructure utilizes physical servers with uplink speeds of ten gigabits per second in most installations, though realistic end-user speeds typically max out at approximately five hundred megabits per second under conditions where multiple users share server capacity simultaneously. The partnership structure allows Brave to avoid the substantial capital expenditure required to build and maintain global VPN infrastructure while still maintaining quality assurance and security oversight through close collaboration with Guardian’s engineering team.
This architectural choice has significant implications for how Brave can evolve its VPN offerings. Guardian’s infrastructure must adhere to Brave’s privacy-first philosophies, and the two organizations collaborate on security policies and feature development. However, this also means Brave’s VPN capabilities are somewhat constrained by Guardian’s infrastructure limitations and development priorities. For example, Brave VPN lacks obfuscation protocols specifically designed to bypass VPN detection in heavily censored regions, a limitation that Guardian hasn’t prioritized in its infrastructure development. This constraint prevents Brave VPN from functioning effectively in countries like China, where aggressive firewall detection and blocking specifically targets VPN traffic patterns.
Protocol Support and Encryption Standards
Brave VPN supports two distinct VPN protocols: WireGuard and IKEv2, representing a deliberate balance between cutting-edge performance and proven stability. WireGuard, the newer and more streamlined protocol, utilizes ChaCha20 encryption and represents the fastest, most lightweight tunneling protocol available on the market today. The protocol’s minimal codebase and modern cryptographic foundations enable superior performance compared to older protocols, particularly on devices with limited processing power. WireGuard’s architecture is fundamentally different from legacy protocols, employing state-of-the-art elliptic curve cryptography and eliminating unnecessary complexity that characterized protocols like OpenVPN.
IKEv2, by contrast, employs AES-256 encryption and represents an older, more established protocol with proven track record across various network conditions. While IKEv2 typically shows marginally slower performance than WireGuard in head-to-head comparisons, it offers superior stability on mobile networks where users frequently transition between Wi-Fi and cellular connections. The protocol’s connection establishment process and ability to handle network switching with minimal interruption makes it particularly valuable for mobile users who may experience frequent connectivity transitions. By supporting both protocols, Brave allows users to optimize for either performance or stability based on their specific usage patterns and network environments.
Both encryption standards employed by these protocols—ChaCha20 and AES-256—represent top-tier encryption strength and are found across virtually all premium VPN providers. The encryption occurs between the user’s device and the VPN server, ensuring that all internet traffic passing through the encrypted tunnel remains unreadable to ISPs, network administrators, and other potential observers monitoring network traffic. However, it’s important to note that encryption alone does not provide complete privacy protection; the VPN provider itself must maintain trustworthy no-logs policies to ensure that VPN usage patterns cannot be reconstructed or misused.
Server Infrastructure and Geographic Coverage
As of October 2024, Brave VPN operates more than three hundred servers distributed across more than forty countries and regions worldwide. This represents a substantial expansion from the service’s earlier deployment, when geographic coverage was significantly more limited. The server network now includes major regions such as Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and multiple locations throughout the United States. The user-facing interface allows geographic selection at the city level rather than just country level, enabling users in nations with multiple server locations to optimize for latency and performance characteristics specific to their geographic proximity to available servers.
However, despite these expansions, Brave’s server network remains substantially smaller than many competing VPN services that offer thousands of servers across a hundred or more countries. ExpressVPN operates over three thousand servers in more than one hundred countries, while CyberGhost provides nine thousand five hundred servers and Private Internet Access grants access to over thirty thousand servers. This disparity in server infrastructure has practical implications for users in regions distant from Brave’s available servers. For instance, users in India, Saudi Arabia, or parts of Central Africa have limited options for server selection, typically forcing them to route through distant servers in Singapore or Europe, which increases latency and reduces connection speeds relative to what users with servers in closer geographic proximity might achieve. Digital nomads and international travelers in regions with sparse server coverage may experience notably reduced performance compared to users in well-served geographic areas.
The limited geographic footprint also affects Brave’s ability to unblock region-restricted content on streaming platforms. While major streaming services like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and BBC iPlayer operate in numerous countries, Brave’s ability to rotate through diverse geographic IPs to access different regional libraries is constrained compared to services with more comprehensive server networks. Testing conducted by independent reviewers found that Brave VPN successfully accessed Netflix libraries in multiple locations and Amazon Prime Video in various regions without buffering issues, demonstrating functional streaming capability, but the limited server selection necessarily constrains the available options compared to competitors with more extensive infrastructure.
Pricing, Subscription Models, and Device Coverage
Subscription Structure and Cost Analysis
Brave VPN operates on a straightforward subscription model with two primary purchasing options: a monthly subscription at nine dollars and ninety-nine cents or an annual subscription at ninety-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents, representing a twelve-month period. The annual subscription provides a discount equivalent to one month of service free, a standard pricing structure that aligns with industry conventions. No free permanent tier exists; instead, Brave offers all users a seven-day free trial regardless of platform, allowing potential customers to evaluate the service before committing to payment.
The pricing structure must be evaluated within the context of what Brave offers relative to competing services. The monthly rate of $9.99 positions Brave at the middle-to-premium end of the consumer VPN market. NordVPN’s standard tier ranges from $3.99 to $12.99 monthly depending on subscription length, Surfshark costs between $2.49 and $15.45 monthly, and ExpressVPN ranges from $8.32 to $12.95 monthly. However, these pricing comparisons become more nuanced when considering what each service includes. Brave VPN’s value proposition centers on seamless browser integration, the ability to protect an entire device rather than just browser traffic, and inclusion of firewall-level protections alongside traditional VPN encryption. For users who value integration and simplicity over maximum geographic flexibility, Brave’s pricing may represent reasonable value. Conversely, users prioritizing maximum server network diversity or advanced features like multi-hop connections may find competing services more cost-effective.
Device Coverage Expansion
One of the most substantial improvements announced in the October 2024 update involved the expansion of device coverage from five simultaneous connections to ten simultaneous connections at no increase in pricing. This doubling of device capacity dramatically improves the value proposition for families and users managing multiple devices across platforms. Previously, a five-device limit meant that users with smartphone, tablet, laptop, desktop computer, and smart home device could only protect four of five devices simultaneously with a single subscription. The expansion to ten devices accommodates substantially more complex household technology ecosystems while maintaining the same subscription cost of $9.99 monthly or $99.99 annually.
The device expansion is particularly significant because Brave allows a single subscription to span across entirely different operating systems and device types. One subscription can simultaneously protect Android phones, iOS devices, Windows computers, and macOS machines regardless of how many devices of each type a user owns, up to the ten-device limit. Adding additional devices to an existing subscription is accomplished through the account management portal at account.brave.com, where users can manage subscriptions and link new devices to their account without requiring new purchases or subscription modifications. This cross-platform flexibility contrasts with some VPN providers that charge different rates or have more restrictive policies regarding multi-platform coverage.
The Brave website continues to note that Linux support is “coming soon,” indicating that current VPN coverage encompasses Android, iOS, Windows, and macOS but notably excludes Linux despite the Brave browser itself having full Linux support. This gap represents a limitation for Linux users who might otherwise benefit from Brave’s integrated approach, forcing them to either use external VPN tools alongside Brave or forgo VPN protection entirely when browsing. Given the privacy-conscious demographics frequently associated with Linux adoption, this omission represents a notable limitation in Brave’s coverage.
Cross-Device Management and Account Synchronization
Managing multiple devices on a single Brave VPN subscription is accomplished through the redesigned account portal at account.brave.com, which underwent comprehensive redesign as part of the October 2024 update. The portal enables users to add new devices, manage subscription billing details, and view the status of all connected devices. Desktop users can now purchase annual subscriptions directly through this portal, a feature that was previously available only to mobile users purchasing through app stores, creating consistency across platforms. The annual subscription option for desktop represents a cost savings of one month per year compared to monthly billing, providing a tangible incentive for users to commit to longer subscription periods.
Users who have previously subscribed to Brave VPN on mobile devices can now link their desktop Brave browsers to the same subscription without purchasing a new account or managing multiple subscriptions. This synchronization prevents accidental duplicate charges and simplifies the user experience for multi-device households. Importantly, billing information is processed by Stripe and handled by the respective app stores for mobile purchases rather than being directly stored on Brave’s servers, creating additional separation between subscription payment information and VPN usage data. This architectural choice reinforces Brave’s privacy positioning by ensuring that Brave itself has no visibility into payment details—only confirmation that a particular email address has an active subscription.
Privacy and Security Architecture
No-Logs Policy and Data Retention Practices
Brave VPN maintains a strict no-logs policy, fundamentally stating that Brave neither stores nor retains any records of user VPN activity, connection data, IP addresses, bandwidth usage, or DNS queries. The scope of this no-logs commitment encompasses all forms of user-attributable connection information; Brave explicitly states it is “impossible” for the company to discover anything about VPN usage beyond the fact that a particular email address purchased a subscription. This commitment extends to stating that Brave cannot determine when users connect to the VPN or whether they have ever used the VPN at all, creating an architecture where VPN usage is effectively invisible to Brave’s own systems.
The technical implementation of this no-logs policy relies on what Brave describes as “unlinkable purchase tokens,” a cryptographic mechanism that breaks the connection between a subscription purchase and actual VPN usage. When users subscribe to Brave VPN using an email address and payment method, they receive unlinkable daily tokens that validate their subscription when connecting to the VPN, but these tokens contain no information linking them to the user’s identity or specific devices. This approach means that the VPN service only sees that a valid token has presented itself for authentication; the service doesn’t see the email address associated with that token, the payment information used to purchase the subscription, or any other identifying details about the token’s holder.
Data retention practices specifically address what limited information Brave does process during normal VPN operations. Information processed to send firewall alerts when suspicious activity is detected—including pseudonymous user IDs and details about blocked trackers or firewall rules—is retained for three days before automatic deletion. Email addresses provided during support ticket submissions are retained for twelve months after support cases close to enable follow-up communications if needed. However, the explicit architecture of the system ensures that neither of these retained data types can be meaningfully associated with specific individuals’ VPN usage patterns or network traffic.
Independent Security Audits and Verification
Recognizing that privacy claims require independent verification to maintain credibility, Brave and Guardian initiated a formal third-party security audit process in 2024. Guardian engaged Assured Security Consultants, a Swedish-based security firm, to conduct comprehensive audits of both the software security and infrastructure security of the VPN service. The software security audit, completed in February 2024, examined the code, cryptographic implementations, and security protocols employed by the service. The infrastructure security audit, completed in April 2024, examined the physical server configurations, data handling practices, and network architecture to verify that infrastructure-level controls actually prevent logging of user data as claimed.
The significance of these independent audits lies in their verification of actual practices rather than policy claims alone. Many VPN providers publish privacy policies stating no-logs commitments, but independent audits provide assurance that actual implementation matches stated policy. Brave and Guardian explicitly made the audit reports publicly available in full, demonstrating transparency and willingness to subject themselves to external scrutiny. This transparency contrasts with many competing VPN providers who maintain privacy policies but resist comprehensive third-party audits or limit audit scope. The plan to commission annual audits going forward indicates a commitment to ongoing verification rather than one-time validation.
However, it’s worth noting that while Brave’s audits are significant, some competing services have undergone audits from multiple different security firms over longer periods. ExpressVPN and NordVPN, for example, have undergone numerous independent audits from various security consultants, creating a deeper track record of verification. Brave’s audit history, while impressive for a relatively new VPN service, is necessarily more limited given the service’s recent expansion and formalization of audit processes. Additionally, audits represent a snapshot in time; they verify practices at the moment of audit but cannot provide real-time ongoing assurance that practices remain consistent.
Geographic Jurisdiction and Legal Implications
Brave Software is headquartered in San Francisco, California, placing the company within the United States legal jurisdiction. This geographic reality carries significant privacy implications that warrant consideration. The United States is a founding member of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance alongside Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, known for extensive data collection and information sharing arrangements. Furthermore, the United States possesses legal mechanisms through which intelligence agencies can compel technology companies to disclose user information through court orders, subpoenas, and secret surveillance orders governed under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Historical precedent demonstrates that the U.S. government has forced VPN companies with existing no-logs policies to implement data logging while simultaneously imposing gag orders preventing the companies from publicly disclosing these legal demands.
This jurisdictional reality creates a fundamental tension with privacy-focused positioning. While Brave maintains a no-logs policy under current operating conditions, the theoretical possibility exists that legal compulsion could force logging implementation if deemed necessary for national security or law enforcement purposes. Some privacy advocates argue this risk is inherent to any U.S.-based technology company regardless of stated policies. However, Brave’s unlinkable credential architecture provides some mitigation: even if Brave were forced to implement logging, the architecture makes it technically difficult to correlate logged connection attempts with specific individuals’ identities. This design choice specifically contemplates the possibility of legal compulsion and attempts to limit the damage that could result.
Competing VPN providers based in jurisdictions considered more privacy-friendly—such as Switzerland, Panama, or the British Virgin Islands—offer theoretical advantages regarding resistance to government data requests. However, these jurisdictional advantages must be balanced against Brave’s overall security posture, audit history, and the practical reality that modern digital surveillance encompasses far more than VPN logs. Metadata, traffic patterns, and other technical indicators can reveal substantial information about user behavior even in the absence of detailed logs. The choice between Brave VPN and competitors thus becomes a complex evaluation of multiple factors rather than a simple jurisdiction-based comparison.
Comparative Analysis with Competing VPN Services
Strengths Relative to Competing Services
Brave VPN’s most distinctive strength lies in its seamless integration within the Brave browser, eliminating the need for users to download, install, and manage a separate VPN application. This architectural advantage reduces friction in adoption and simplifies the user experience for individuals already committed to the Brave browser ecosystem. Users can toggle VPN protection on or off directly from the browser toolbar without navigating between applications or managing separate login credentials. Additionally, Brave VPN provides device-wide protection extending beyond browser traffic to encompass all applications and services on the device, a capability that browser-based VPN solutions cannot provide.
The recent expansion to ten simultaneous device connections represents exceptional value compared to many competitors. Most VPN providers limit simultaneous connections to between five and eight devices, making Brave’s ten-device allowance industry-leading for single-subscription coverage. For families or power users managing multiple devices across platforms, this expanded coverage significantly improves the value proposition. Furthermore, Brave’s pricing of $9.99 monthly or $99.99 annually places it competitively within the VPN market, particularly when the device expansion is factored into per-device costs.
The completion of independent security audits by Assured Security Consultants provides verification of Brave’s no-logs claims and infrastructure security practices, creating important third-party validation that distinguishes Brave from many competitors. While some established VPN providers like ExpressVPN and NordVPN have been audited by multiple firms, many emerging or smaller VPN services lack formal independent audits, making Brave’s audit completion a significant credibility marker.
Limitations and Competitive Disadvantages
Despite these strengths, Brave VPN faces substantial limitations compared to established competitors, particularly regarding server network scale and geographic diversity. With more than three hundred servers across forty countries, Brave’s network is dwarfed by ExpressVPN’s three thousand servers across ninety-four countries, Surfshark’s thirty-two hundred servers, and CyberGhost’s more than seven thousand servers. For users prioritizing maximum geographic flexibility, ability to access diverse regional content libraries, or need for nearby server proximity to minimize latency, Brave’s limited infrastructure represents a genuine disadvantage.
Brave VPN also lacks obfuscation protocols specifically designed to disguise VPN traffic as regular web traffic or overcome sophisticated firewall detection systems. The service employs only WireGuard and IKEv2 protocols without obfuscation variants, making it ineffective in highly censored countries like China where firewalls actively detect and block VPN connections. While Brave VPN functions adequately in regions with moderate restrictions like Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, users in heavily censored environments cannot rely on Brave for circumventing state-level censorship.
The absence of advanced security features common in competing services represents another limitation. Brave VPN lacks specialized double VPN or multi-hop routing capabilities that route traffic through multiple servers sequentially for enhanced anonymity. Many competing services offer split tunneling on multiple platforms, but Brave’s split tunneling implementation on Android devices is relatively limited compared to competitors. Additionally, while Brave includes a kill switch preventing unencrypted traffic if the VPN connection drops, this feature is foundational security architecture rather than distinctive innovation.
Comparisons across multiple independent review publications consistently identify competing services like NordVPN, Surfshark, or ExpressVPN as superior choices for users prioritizing maximum flexibility, advanced features, or geographic coverage. These reviews typically recommend Brave VPN primarily for users already committed to the Brave ecosystem who value convenience and simplicity over feature comprehensiveness or maximum geographic flexibility.
Specific Comparative Performance Metrics
Speed testing conducted by independent reviewers found that Brave VPN achieves reasonable performance under typical usage conditions but shows some variance depending on geographic proximity to available servers. When connecting to European servers from Europe, testing detected minimal speed reduction—approximately 3.65 percent download speed reduction and 4.55 percent upload speed reduction with latency increasing 184.62 percent relative to unencrypted baseline connections. These reductions represent acceptable performance degradation for practical VPN usage and remain within acceptable ranges for most online activities including streaming and general browsing.
When connecting to distant servers (such as from Europe to United States or Singapore), speed reductions increased substantially, with significantly elevated latency making responsiveness slower than local connections. This expected behavior reflects VPN architectural limitations rather than Brave-specific deficiencies but demonstrates that users distant from available Brave servers may experience noticeably degraded performance compared to users with nearby server options. Competitors offering servers in significantly more geographic locations typically provide more options for finding nearby servers with lower latency.
Streaming service access testing found that Brave VPN successfully unblocked Netflix US, Netflix international libraries, Amazon Prime Video, and BBC iPlayer without persistent buffering issues or resolution degradation. This demonstrates functional ability to access region-restricted content, though the limited server count necessarily constrains the available regional libraries compared to services with more extensive server networks. Torrenting functionality testing found Brave VPN fully compatible with P2P applications, though the service doesn’t formally support or optimize for torrenting as some competitors do.
Practical Usage and User Experience
Browser Integration and User Interface
Accessing Brave VPN on desktop is accomplished through a dedicated VPN button integrated directly into the address bar, providing immediate one-click activation without navigating through menus. Clicking this button reveals a panel showing the current connection status, selected server location, and options to change geographic location through an intuitive server selection interface. The redesigned account portal at account.brave.com provides centralized management for subscription billing, device linking, and account settings. On mobile devices, VPN functionality is accessed through the browser settings menu, with a toggle switch to activate or deactivate protection.
The streamlined server selection interface introduced in the October 2024 update allows users to select servers at the city level rather than merely at the country level, providing more precise control over connection routing. Users can view all available servers across supported regions and select specific cities within those regions, giving them flexibility to optimize for latency characteristics specific to their network environment. This granularity exceeds what many competing VPN applications provide at the browser level.
Brave VPN can be enabled or disabled at any time without requiring browser restart or complex configuration procedures. The service maintains automatic connection through the VPN tunnel once activated, requiring no ongoing user intervention. Device-level protection means that all applications, services, and web traffic on the device routes through the VPN automatically once activated, providing comprehensive coverage that browser-level VPN solutions cannot achieve. Users concerned about forgetting to activate the VPN can take assurance that once enabled, protection is maintained continuously until manually disabled.
Free Trial and Subscription Activation
All users, regardless of prior Brave usage, can access a seven-day free trial of Brave VPN without providing payment information. The trial activation process requires minimal friction: on desktop, users click the VPN button and select “Start free trial,” while on mobile, opening the browser settings and toggling on Brave VPN initiates the trial. After seven days, the trial automatically converts to a paid subscription, but users can cancel at any point during the trial period without incurring charges.
The trial period provides sufficient time for realistic evaluation of whether Brave VPN meets individual user needs. Seven days encompasses enough varied usage patterns to assess speed, connection stability, geographic functionality, and integration experience. Users can test streaming capability, geographic unblocking functionality, and general browsing performance during the trial before committing to paid subscription. Trial cancellation is straightforward, accomplished through the same account portal interface used for subscription management, with no hidden cancellation fees or complicated procedures.
For users proceeding to paid subscription, pricing options remain consistent across platforms: $9.99 monthly or $99.99 annually. Subscriptions can be cancelled at any time, with active protection continuing through the end of the current billing period before access terminates. Brave explicitly states that subscription cancellation does not delete user accounts or prevent continued use of free Brave features, ensuring that cancelling VPN subscription doesn’t negatively impact other Brave services.
Configuration and Optimization
Brave VPN configuration options are deliberately minimized to maintain simplicity and default security. Users cannot adjust encryption standards, as WireGuard and IKEv2 are selected internally based on device type and usage patterns rather than offering user selection. This simplified configuration approach trades maximum user control for guaranteed security defaults—users cannot accidentally select outdated encryption standards or other configurations that might reduce security. For advanced users accustomed to granular VPN configuration, this limitation represents a deliberate trade-off of flexibility for security.
Server location selection is the primary configuration option available to users. Beyond selecting geographic location, minimal customization is available. The kill switch feature, which prevents unencrypted traffic if the VPN connection drops, is enabled by default with no user toggle for disabling it. This automatic kill switch represents best-practice security architecture but means users cannot reduce this protection even if they specifically want to allow unencrypted fallback traffic. DNS leak protection operates automatically, ensuring that DNS queries route through the VPN tunnel rather than being exposed to ISP surveillance.
On Android devices, split tunneling functionality allows users to designate specific applications that route through normal internet connections rather than the VPN tunnel, providing flexibility for applications that might have trouble with VPN connections. However, this functionality remains more limited than split tunneling implementations on competing services, which often provide more granular control over which applications route through the VPN on additional platforms.
Limitations, Criticisms, and Caveats
Jurisdictional and Governance Concerns
Beyond the inherent jurisdictional questions previously discussed, Brave Software itself has faced criticism regarding its approach to privacy and transparency. In 2020, security researchers discovered that Brave was inserting affiliate referral codes into cryptocurrency exchange URLs, specifically targeting Binance, Coinbase, and Trezor, with which Brave had advertising agreements. The practice directed users to URLs including Brave referral codes, potentially generating revenue for Brave while users believed they were visiting the sites directly. When the practice was discovered and publicized, CEO Brendan Eich characterized the insertion as a “mistake” and committed to making similar advertising practices opt-in rather than default.
Similarly, the Brave browser previously generated criticism for pushing VPN software to Windows users without explicit user consent, according to privacy-focused criticism compilations. These missteps, while addressed or reversed, raise questions about whether Brave’s privacy-first positioning is consistently reflected across all company practices or represents selective prioritization of privacy in specific contexts.
Server Network and Geographic Coverage Limitations
The restricted geographic coverage creates genuine limitations for specific user populations. Digital nomads based in Southeast Asia, South Asia, or Africa find themselves forced to route through distant European or Singapore servers, resulting in elevated latency and reduced throughput compared to users with nearby servers. Travelers in regions lacking Brave servers essentially lose the VPN protection advantage during travel unless they’re willing to accept the speed degradation from distant server routing.
Similarly, users seeking to access multiple regional versions of streaming services face constraints from limited server selection. While Brave successfully unblocks major services like Netflix and Prime Video, the limited server count restricts available regional libraries compared to competitors offering servers throughout the world. Users requiring access to specific regional content libraries may find themselves unable to route through necessary geographic locations using Brave’s available servers.
Protocol Limitations and Censorship Circumvention
The absence of obfuscation protocols represents a hard limitation for users in censored environments. Brave VPN explicitly does not function in China and other countries employing sophisticated firewall systems specifically designed to detect and block VPN traffic. Users in these regions require VPN services with obfuscation protocols like NordVPN, ExpressVPN, or specialized services designed to circumvent state-level censorship. Brave is inadequate for this use case regardless of other service qualities.
Similarly, the absence of protocol selection means users cannot experiment with different protocols if they encounter connectivity issues with the default selection. Some users experience better stability or speed with specific protocols, but Brave’s automatic selection prevents this optimization. The lack of OpenVPN TCP variant represents another constraint—some networks specifically block UDP traffic but permit TCP, yet Brave’s VPN protocols don’t accommodate this specific network configuration.
Feature Minimalism and Advanced User Requirements
The deliberately minimalist feature set limits appeal to advanced users accustomed to comprehensive VPN configuration options. There are no specialized servers optimized for specific use cases, no multi-hop routing, no ability to select between different protocol implementations, and no advanced features like Tor integration or specialized privacy configurations. For users prioritizing maximum control and configuration flexibility, Brave’s simplified approach represents a fundamental limitation rather than an advantage.
The absence of formal P2P optimization means torrenting is supported but not optimized. While testing confirms torrent functionality works, users specifically seeking optimized torrenting servers or P2P-specific features find better options in competitors offering dedicated P2P server networks. Similarly, the lack of specialized streaming servers means unblocking works through geographic variation, but users cannot select from specialized streaming-optimized servers that some competitors provide.
Limited Server Infrastructure Transparency
While Brave publishes that more than three hundred servers exist across more than forty regions, the company provides limited transparency into specific server counts by region, server specifications, load balancing strategies, or infrastructure redundancy arrangements. Competitors often publish comprehensive server lists with specific server locations and capacities, enabling users to identify nearby options and understand infrastructure thoroughly. Brave’s relative opacity regarding specific server configurations prevents comprehensive infrastructure assessment.
Integration with Broader Brave Ecosystem
Synergistic Privacy Architecture
Brave VPN integration with the broader Brave browser ecosystem creates a comprehensive privacy architecture that exceeds what the VPN alone provides. The Brave browser itself, independent of VPN functionality, incorporates powerful tracking protection through Brave Shields, fingerprinting randomization, cookie partitioning, and other privacy protections that operate by default without requiring configuration. When combined with Brave VPN providing device-wide network encryption, users benefit from multiple overlapping privacy layers: browser-level protections against client-side tracking combined with network-level encryption from the VPN.
This layered approach means Brave VPN protects the entire device’s network traffic through encryption, while Brave Shields independently protects against cookie-based tracking, fingerprinting, and other browser-based surveillance mechanisms. Crucially, these protections are complementary rather than redundant—VPN encryption protects against ISP and network-level observation, while Shields protects against website-level tracking mechanisms that operate within encrypted traffic. Users combining the Brave browser with Brave VPN achieve privacy protection at multiple technology layers simultaneously.
Interconnected Account Management
Brave’s unified account system at account.brave.com enables centralized management of VPN subscriptions alongside other Brave premium offerings including Brave Search Premium, Brave Leo AI assistant premium features, and Brave Talk with moderator controls. Users maintain a single login for all Brave services, with subscription billing consolidated under one account. This unified approach simplifies account management compared to services that require separate accounts and logins for different products.
The account portal redesign accompanying the October 2024 VPN update specifically enhanced cross-product subscription management, recognizing that users might subscribe to multiple Brave premium services. The portal now displays all active subscriptions and enables independent management of each service’s subscription without requiring separate logins or account switching.
The Brave VPN Question, Answered
Brave Firewall + VPN represents a thoughtfully designed privacy-focused VPN service specifically optimized for users already committed to the Brave browser ecosystem and prioritizing simplicity alongside privacy protection. The service’s October 2024 updates, particularly the expansion to ten simultaneous device connections, significantly improved its value proposition and competitive positioning. The completed independent security audits by Assured Security Consultants provide meaningful third-party validation of Brave’s no-logs claims, distinguishing the service from many competitors lacking formal verification.
However, potential users must carefully consider whether Brave VPN’s strengths align with their specific requirements. The service excels for users seeking browser-integrated protection across multiple devices within the Brave ecosystem, with straightforward configuration and reasonable pricing. Conversely, users requiring maximum geographic flexibility, advanced configuration options, or ability to circumvent state-level censorship find substantially better options in competitors like ExpressVPN, NordVPN, or Surfshark that offer more extensive server networks, advanced features, and obfuscation protocols specifically designed for censorship circumvention.
The service’s continued development roadmap, including future Linux support, additional server expansion, and new payment options using Brave’s BAT cryptocurrency token, indicates ongoing commitment to enhancement and evolution. For users already invested in Brave’s browser ecosystem and privacy philosophy, Brave VPN represents a compelling addition to their privacy toolkit. For users evaluating VPN options independent of Brave browser commitment, careful comparison with competitors across dimensions of server network scale, feature comprehensiveness, and specific use case requirements remains essential before making purchasing decisions.
Looking forward, Brave’s success in the VPN market will depend on its ability to expand server infrastructure while maintaining its privacy-first positioning and continue innovating on the browser integration advantages that distinguish it from standalone VPN applications. The privacy-conscious user base that initially adopted Brave browser represents a natural market for integrated VPN protection, and ongoing development suggesting this market segment remains a priority for company investment and product development strategy.
Protect Your Digital Life with Activate Security
Get 14 powerful security tools in one comprehensive suite. VPN, antivirus, password manager, dark web monitoring, and more.
Get Protected Now
