This report examines the landscape of Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds and email newsletters as mechanisms for content delivery, with particular emphasis on their roles in mitigating unwanted tracking, advertising surveillance, and digital profiling. The analysis reveals that while email newsletters have become the dominant mode of content distribution, they simultaneously serve as vectors for sophisticated tracking infrastructure that collects extensive data about user behavior, location, device characteristics, and engagement patterns. RSS feeds, by contrast, present a fundamentally different paradigm that prioritizes privacy by design, requiring no personal information for subscription and enabling anonymous content consumption. The examination of contemporary tools, platforms, and regulatory frameworks demonstrates that users seeking to maintain privacy while staying informed face meaningful choices between different distribution technologies, each with distinct implications for data collection and user autonomy. This report synthesizes technical mechanisms, business practices, regulatory requirements, and practical solutions to provide a comprehensive understanding of tracking-light content consumption in the digital media ecosystem.
The Hidden Surveillance Infrastructure Within Email Communications
Email newsletters have become ubiquitous in modern digital communication, serving as a primary mechanism through which organizations, creators, and publishers maintain ongoing contact with audiences. However, the infrastructure underlying email delivery has evolved to incorporate sophisticated tracking mechanisms that operate largely invisible to recipients. Understanding this tracking ecosystem is essential for comprehending why alternative technologies like RSS have gained renewed attention from privacy-conscious users. The architecture of email tracking represents a significant departure from the historical model of email as a relatively transparent communication medium, instead transforming newsletters into data collection instruments that rival traditional web analytics in their comprehensiveness.
The Technical Mechanisms of Spy Pixels and Email Tracking
Email tracking operates through the embedding of invisible tracking pixels within email messages, a practice that has become nearly ubiquitous across commercial email services. A tracking pixel, also known as a spy pixel or web beacon, is a one-by-one pixel graphic rendered invisible through transparency settings, embedded within the HTML code of an email message. When a recipient opens an email containing this pixel, their email client automatically requests the image from the sender’s server, triggering a request that logs extensive information about the recipient and the interaction. This mechanism functions analogously to website analytics tracking, leveraging the automatic behavior of email clients to load remote images upon message opening. The data collected through tracking pixels typically includes the precise timestamp when the email was opened, the recipient’s IP address which reveals their approximate geographic location and internet service provider, the device type and operating system being used to read the message, and sometimes even more granular information about the recipient’s device and browser.
The scale of this surveillance has become staggering. Current research indicates that over fifty percent of daily emails sent and received are tracked through these mechanisms, representing billions of private communications that are monitored, logged, and analyzed every single day. This is not limited to marketing communications from major corporations, but extends to emails from friends, family members, job applicants, and even internal organizational communications sent by employees using email marketing tools. The tracking occurs automatically and transparently, with most email users completely unaware that their engagement with messages is being recorded and analyzed.
Beyond simple open tracking, email systems now employ tracking links that extend surveillance capabilities further. Tracking links incorporate URL parameters, most commonly Uniform Resource Identifier (UTM) parameters developed originally for Google Analytics, which allow senders to monitor not only whether recipients clicked links within emails, but also which specific links they clicked, when they clicked them, and what actions they took on the destination website. This creates a connected surveillance chain extending from email opening through to website behavior, enabling comprehensive behavioral profiling across multiple digital touchpoints.
The Mechanisms and Motivations Behind Email Tracking
The proliferation of email tracking stems from the fundamental business model of email marketing platforms and the metrics they provide to their customers. Email service providers, including major platforms serving millions of users, offer tracking capabilities as key selling points to their enterprise clients, promising detailed engagement metrics that supposedly allow marketers to optimize their campaigns. The tracking pixel system persists despite widespread recognition of its privacy implications because it has become normalized within marketing practice and because many email platforms have made turning off tracking technically difficult or impossible. One privacy advocate documented attempting to disable tracking on the Revue newsletter platform only to discover that no interface existed to completely disable link tracking, forcing them to migrate to alternative platforms. Similarly, investigations into Mailgun, a major email delivery infrastructure provider used by numerous newsletter platforms, revealed that the service collects and stores detailed event data for every message, including information about opens, clicks, and bounces, with storage periods of at least thirty days for paid accounts.
The motivations for platform operators to facilitate tracking extend beyond simple analytics provision. Email platforms increasingly view subscriber data and behavioral information as valuable assets that can be monetized or leveraged for competitive advantage. Several major email platforms have historically sold access to their subscribers’ engagement data or used this information to create audience insights products marketed separately to advertisers. This creates a fundamental conflict of interest: the platforms operating email services benefit financially from extensive data collection, even when this collection conflicts with the privacy interests of their users.
Privacy and Security Threats Associated with Email Tracking
The implications of email tracking extend far beyond the benign measurement of marketing campaign performance. Security researchers and privacy advocates have documented serious threats that email tracking enables. Malicious actors can use tracking pixels to confirm whether email addresses are active and monitored before launching targeted phishing campaigns; the simple act of opening an email containing a malicious tracking pixel signals to an attacker that the email address is valid and actively used. This confirmation step significantly increases the effectiveness of subsequent phishing attempts. Similarly, tracking pixels combined with other publicly available information can enable doxxing attacks, where malicious actors use location data extracted from email opens combined with other data sources to identify, locate, and profile individuals.
Beyond criminal exploitation, email tracking creates security vulnerabilities through data exposure risks. Email addresses frequently serve as login credentials for multiple online services; when email tracking data is compromised through data breaches—which occur with alarming frequency—the leaked information can facilitate targeted attacks against those accounts. Additionally, device fingerprinting information extracted from email opens can enable cross-platform tracking, allowing services to follow individuals across different devices and digital services. The behavioral profiling enabled by email tracking creates comprehensive pictures of individuals’ online activity over time, which third-party data brokers then purchase and resell.
Workplace surveillance represents another significant concern, as employers have used tracking pixels embedded in internal emails to quietly monitor which employees engage with organizational communications without the employees’ knowledge or consent. This creates an environment of silent workplace monitoring that raises serious questions about employment privacy and organizational trust. Political organizations use tracking pixels within campaign emails to build behavioral profiles of constituents without explicit consent, potentially using this profiling information to identify supporters and opponents for microtargeting or resource allocation.
RSS Feeds: A Fundamentally Different Architecture for Content Delivery
In contrast to the surveillance-enabled infrastructure of email newsletters, RSS (Really Simple Syndication or RDF Site Summary) represents a fundamentally different paradigm for content distribution. Really Simple Syndication technology emerged in the late 1990s as a simple, open standard for content syndication that enables websites to publish their content in a machine-readable format that aggregators can consume. The technology precedes modern email tracking systems by decades and was designed with a philosophy of simplicity, decentralization, and user control. Where email newsletters require users to provide personal email addresses and establish direct relationships with senders, RSS feeds enable anonymous, pull-based content consumption where users retrieve content on their own schedule using aggregator applications.
The Technical Architecture and Privacy Advantages of RSS
The fundamental architecture of RSS differs critically from email in several ways that create inherent privacy advantages. RSS feeds are simple XML files that contain article titles, descriptions, publication dates, and links, structured in a standardized format that any RSS reader application can parse and display. When a user subscribes to an RSS feed, they do not provide any personal information to the feed publisher; instead, they simply provide their RSS reader with the URL of the feed. The RSS reader then periodically checks the feed URL to retrieve new content, with no communication between the reader and the publisher containing any identifying information about the user.
This architecture creates a crucial privacy distinction: RSS feeds are inherently anonymous at the distribution layer. Feed publishers cannot determine who has subscribed to their feeds, cannot track when specific individuals read their content, and cannot identify which specific subscribers clicked particular links. The publisher simply publishes their content in a standardized format, and anyone with the feed URL can access it using any RSS reader application. This anonymity is not an optional feature that users must explicitly enable; it is built into the fundamental design of the technology.
Because RSS feeds are simple XML files containing only content and metadata, they inherently cannot carry tracking pixels, invisible images, or JavaScript-based tracking code. The feed format does not support the embedding of tracking mechanisms the way email messages, which are HTML-based and support embedded images and JavaScript, naturally accommodate. Users consuming content through RSS readers receive the actual content without any tracking infrastructure attached. Some advanced RSS readers, such as Miniflux, explicitly remove tracking parameters from URLs within articles, stripping away UTM codes and other tracking identifiers to further enhance privacy.
Privacy as a Fundamental Feature Rather Than An Optional Addition
The privacy advantages of RSS stem from design philosophy rather than policy decisions by operators. Since RSS feeds are open standards that anyone can implement, individual publishers cannot unilaterally add tracking to the RSS distribution layer without breaking the standard or creating proprietary extensions that would be incompatible with standard RSS readers. This technical architecture creates a form of privacy protection by design: users automatically receive privacy protections simply by using RSS readers, without needing to purchase special privacy-focused services or enable specific privacy settings.
In stark contrast, achieving equivalent privacy protections within the email ecosystem requires extensive effort from users and operators. Email privacy requires users to manually disable tracking in their email clients, use browser extensions to block tracking pixels, utilize specialized privacy-focused email providers, or employ technical workarounds. Even with these measures, users cannot guarantee complete protection because email service providers themselves may collect tracking data for “abuse prevention” or other purposes independent of the tracking pixel mechanism. The privacy protections available within RSS are vastly simpler and more reliable because they flow from the fundamental technical architecture rather than from policy or user preference.
The Historical War on RSS and Corporate Resistance to Decentralized Content Distribution
Despite these privacy and user control advantages, RSS feeds have been subject to what industry observers describe as an “undeclared war” from major internet platforms that benefit from centralized, algorithm-controlled content distribution. When Facebook and Twitter were growing their user bases, both platforms offered RSS feeds to publishers. However, once these platforms achieved dominance in their user bases, they removed RSS support entirely, converting themselves into closed, algorithmic platforms where users can only access curated content selected by the platforms’ algorithms. This transition from open RSS distribution to proprietary algorithms corresponded precisely with the platforms’ shift toward monetization models based on extensive user tracking and behavioral profiling.
Similarly, web browsers historically displayed visual indicators showing whether websites offered RSS feeds, making it easy for users to discover and subscribe to feeds. These indicators were quietly removed across all major browsers, reducing the visibility of RSS as a content distribution option and making it less discoverable to non-technical users. Google, Facebook, and Twitter all participated in reducing the discoverability and prominence of RSS, not through explicit prohibition but through the consistent removal of RSS support and visibility features. This transition served the financial interests of these platforms, which benefit enormously from centralized control over content distribution and the comprehensive tracking that this control enables.
Contemporary Newsletter Platforms and Their Tracking Practices
The modern landscape of email newsletter platforms reveals a spectrum of approaches to tracking and privacy, ranging from platforms that facilitate extensive tracking to those that explicitly position privacy protection as a core product feature. Understanding the differences among platforms is essential for users seeking to build audiences through newsletters while maintaining ethical standards regarding subscriber privacy.
Privacy-First Newsletter Platforms
Buttondown emerges as an explicitly privacy-focused newsletter platform that has structured its entire business model around respecting subscriber privacy. Buttondown’s privacy page states directly that “your data is yours, your subscribers’ data belongs to them, and we don’t collect anything that we don’t have to in order to do our jobs”. The platform collects IP addresses, open and click events, and email client information specifically for the account holder’s use, but subscribers can completely opt out of any analytics collection if they choose. Users can disable open tracking, disable link tracking, or completely disable analytics entirely, with full control over what data is collected. Critically, Buttondown does not sell subscriber data or any subscriber information, instead generating revenue directly from customers who choose to pay for the service.
However, one developer documenting their migration to Buttondown discovered that privacy-first positioning at the application level does not automatically translate to privacy-first practices at the infrastructure level. Upon investigating the underlying email delivery service that Buttondown uses (Mailgun), they discovered that Mailgun collects and stores comprehensive data about every email event, including all opens, clicks, bounces, and other interactions, for at least thirty days in paid accounts. This data collection occurs within Mailgun’s infrastructure independent of whether users have disabled tracking in Buttondown itself. This discovery revealed what the developer termed “the sad state of privacy in email,” wherein even platforms explicitly committed to privacy must rely on underlying infrastructure that collects and retains extensive data.
This technical reality creates a fundamental limitation: users seeking complete privacy through email newsletters must not only select a privacy-conscious email platform but must also investigate and approve of the underlying infrastructure providers that those platforms rely upon. This represents a significant increase in complexity compared to RSS feeds, where the privacy properties flow from the fundamental technology rather than from individual platform decisions. One individual who turned off tracking on their small personal newsletter found the experience both liberating and revealing; by removing the dashboard metrics showing who opened and clicked her emails, she discovered that direct engagement with subscribers through asking them to reply to her newsletters generated far stronger community connection than obsessive monitoring of tracking metrics. The removal of tracking made her less certain whether subscribers were reading, but the increased engagement from subscribers who chose to respond suggested that respecting privacy actually strengthened relationships with the most engaged audience members.
Mainstream Platforms and Their Default Tracking Infrastructure
In stark contrast to privacy-first platforms, mainstream newsletter services like Mailchimp, Substack, Beehiiv, and MailerLite have built their businesses substantially on the basis of collecting and leveraging subscriber engagement data. These platforms offer extensive analytics dashboards showing open rates, click rates, and subscriber engagement metrics as core features, and these metrics are only possible through the implementation of extensive tracking infrastructure.
Beehiiv, which has grown extremely rapidly and now serves some of the largest newsletters on the internet, offers “powerful growth and monetization features” prominently including detailed analytics. Beehiiv generates its revenue through multiple mechanisms including platform fees, an integrated advertising network where brands pay to have their newsletters promoted to Beehiiv subscribers, and a referral system that monetizes the distribution of content across the platform. This revenue model depends fundamentally on understanding subscriber engagement, which requires extensive tracking infrastructure.
Similarly, Substack, one of the most prominent newsletter platforms, collects extensive personal data for multiple purposes outlined in its privacy policy. Substack collects subscription status information, email addresses, device information, and IP addresses, and reserves the right to use this information for various business purposes including law enforcement cooperation and integration with third-party services. The platform’s privacy policy explicitly states that Creators (publishers) own their content but that Substack retains broad rights to user data.
These mainstream platforms typically do not allow users to disable tracking. MailerLite, despite being positioned as an alternative to Mailchimp with a more user-friendly interface, does not offer built-in tracking disablement for newsletter subscribers. While MailerLite’s free plan is generous and the platform is genuinely easier to use than Mailchimp in many respects, the platform’s business model requires tracking to enable the analytics and segmentation features that differentiate it in the marketplace. For users seeking a mainstream newsletter platform with some privacy consciousness, MailerLite represents a reasonable compromise, but it does not offer equivalent privacy protection to Buttondown.
The Technology of Tracking Prevention and User Protection
Given the prevalence of email tracking, numerous tools and techniques have emerged to help users prevent or block tracking pixels and reduce their exposure to surveillance through email. Understanding the landscape of tracking prevention tools is essential for users seeking to maintain privacy while participating in email-based communication and content consumption.
Browser Extensions and Client-Side Tracking Detection
Multiple browser extensions have been developed specifically to detect and block email tracking pixels within email clients accessed through web browsers. Ugly Email, marketed as the “#1 most downloaded Gmail extension for blocking read receipts and other email tracking pixels,” scans through user inboxes and identifies emails containing tracking pixels, labeling tracked emails with a visible eye icon. The extension blocks the loading of tracking pixels, preventing the sender from receiving notification that the email was opened. Importantly, Ugly Email stores all detection data locally within the user’s browser’s IndexDB storage and explicitly does not track, transfer, or store any user information centrally. Other similar extensions like Email Tracker and Pixelblock serve equivalent functions across different email platforms.
However, browser extension-based tracking blocking has significant limitations. These extensions only function on desktop browsers; they cannot detect or block tracking pixels on mobile devices or within native email applications. This creates a substantial protection gap, as a significant and growing percentage of email opens occur on mobile devices rather than desktop browsers. Additionally, browser extensions can be unreliable when email clients update their interfaces, and users must remember to keep extensions updated to maintain protection.
Email Provider-Level Tracking Protection
Apple Mail Privacy Protection represents the most significant platform-level initiative to block email tracking at the infrastructure level. Implemented beginning September 20, 2021, Apple Mail Privacy Protection allows users to enable privacy protections that hide their IP address and prevent email senders from determining when emails are opened. When enabled, Apple Mail automatically pre-loads all images in emails through Apple’s servers before the user reads the email, which triggers tracking pixels before the user has actually opened the message, resulting in “false opens” that make open rate data unreliable for email senders.
This feature has profoundly disrupted email marketing analytics. Studies indicate that Apple Mail Privacy Protection inflates open rates for users who enable the feature, making it impossible for senders to distinguish between actual opens by humans and automatic pre-loading by Apple’s servers. While open rates have become less reliable as a metric, click-through rates remain more trustworthy since users must manually click links rather than having links pre-loaded. However, Apple’s implementation also includes Link Tracking Protection as of iOS 17, which removes tracking parameters from URLs in emails and in Safari, further degrading the reliability of URL-based tracking.
Proton Mail offers another form of platform-level tracking protection. Proton Mail blocks known email trackers by default across all devices, pre-loading remote images through proxy servers with generic IP addresses to hide the user’s actual IP address and location. Proton Mail also removes known tracking parameters from URLs in emails on its web app, allowing users to click links without senders monitoring their behavior. This protection is enabled by default for all Proton Mail users and operates at the infrastructure level rather than requiring individual users to install browser extensions or configure settings.
VPN Usage and Additional Privacy Measures
Users seeking additional protection beyond tracking pixel blocking can utilize Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to mask their IP addresses when accessing email through web interfaces, though this adds complexity and does not prevent the collection of other metadata that email tracking mechanisms capture. Disabling automatic image loading in email clients prevents tracking pixels from firing, as the pixels require image downloads to function, but this approach removes legitimate imagery from emails and requires manual action to view full email content. These technical workarounds represent partial solutions that either degrade user experience or require substantial effort from users.
RSS Readers and Self-Hosting Infrastructure for Privacy-First Content Consumption
For users seeking to consume content through RSS feeds, a diverse ecosystem of reader applications exists, ranging from proprietary cloud-based services to open-source self-hosted solutions. The choice among RSS readers carries significant implications for privacy and user control.
Hosted RSS Reading Services and Their Privacy Implications
Feedbin represents a prominent hosted RSS reading service that explicitly positions privacy as a core feature. At five dollars per month, Feedbin provides a clean, distraction-free interface for reading feeds, with support for podcasts, YouTube subscriptions, and email newsletter integration through unique email addresses provided to each user. Feedbin offers read-it-later functionality, powerful search capabilities, and integration with numerous sharing and bookmarking services. The service has received significant positive feedback from privacy-conscious users who appreciate its straightforward approach and commitment to privacy.
However, all hosted RSS services carry an inherent privacy limitation: the service operators can observe which feeds users subscribe to, which articles users read, and which feeds users click links from. While Feedbin and similar hosted services do not sell this data or use it for behavioral advertising, the developers retain the technical ability to access this information. This represents a meaningful privacy tradeoff compared to fully decentralized self-hosted solutions, where feed reading activity remains completely private to the individual user.
Self-Hosted RSS Reader Platforms
Self-hosted RSS readers allow users to deploy their own feed aggregation infrastructure on personal or rented servers, maintaining complete control over the RSS reading infrastructure and ensuring that no third-party service operator can observe feed subscriptions or reading activity. FreshRSS exemplifies the current standard for self-hosted RSS aggregation. FreshRSS is a free, open-source feed aggregator that is lightweight, powerful, and highly customizable. The platform can manage over one million articles and fifty thousand feeds without performance degradation, making it suitable for both individual users and small organization deployment. FreshRSS supports numerous features including feed import/export through OPML (Outline Processor Markup Language) files, real-time feed updates through WebSub protocols, powerful search functionality, and customizable themes and extensions.
Installation and deployment of FreshRSS can occur through multiple methods including bare metal installation on dedicated servers or Docker containerization for simplified deployment on existing server infrastructure. One self-hosted FreshRSS deployment documented on a home server setup running OpenMediaVault demonstrates the practical feasibility of self-hosting for individual users. The installation requires only several simple configuration steps in Docker Compose files, and once running, FreshRSS provides a fully private RSS reading environment accessible through a local domain name on the home network. This approach ensures that feed subscription data, reading activity, and click patterns remain completely within the individual’s control and infrastructure.
Miniflux provides an alternative self-hosted RSS reader emphasizing minimalism and straightforward functionality. Miniflux explicitly removes tracking pixels from articles and strips tracking parameters from URLs, providing built-in privacy protections beyond the inherent privacy of RSS. The platform supports numerous advanced features including content manipulation through custom CSS selectors and regular expressions, full-text search powered by PostgreSQL, media proxying to prevent tracking, and integration with privacy-focused YouTube alternatives. Miniflux operates as a PostgreSQL-backed web application, and its minimal aesthetic and focus on core functionality makes it particularly attractive to users seeking a streamlined RSS experience.
Tiny Tiny RSS represents another established self-hosted option with extensive customization capabilities through plugins and themes. Despite having a development team that has sometimes been described as unfriendly to newcomers, Tiny Tiny RSS offers comprehensive functionality equivalent to commercial RSS readers while maintaining complete user control over the infrastructure. The platform includes built-in mobile apps for Android and supports multiple third-party client integrations through various APIs.
Converting Email Newsletters to RSS Feeds
For individuals who receive content through email newsletters but prefer to read that content within RSS readers, several tools have emerged that convert email newsletters into RSS feeds for consumption within standard RSS aggregators. Kill the Newsletter, an open-source project, exemplifies this approach. Kill the Newsletter generates a unique email address for each newsletter subscription, and emails sent to that address are converted into individual entries within an Atom feed. Users subscribe to newsletters using the unique Kill the Newsletter email address, and the service automatically converts incoming newsletter emails into feed entries that can be read through any standard RSS reader.
Feedbin integrates newsletter conversion directly into its platform, providing each Pro account with a unique email address through which newsletter subscriptions can be delivered and read as RSS feeds. This integration allows users to consolidate all their content reading—including RSS feeds, podcasts, and email newsletters—into a single RSS reading interface. The newsletter-to-RSS conversion reduces inbox clutter by removing newsletters from the email interface while maintaining access to newsletter content through the preferred RSS reading application.
Combining Kill the Newsletter with SimpleLogin, another privacy-focused service that generates unique email aliases, creates a robust workflow for newsletter subscription while maintaining high privacy standards. SimpleLogin generates unique email addresses for each newsletter subscription, and these addresses forward emails to Kill the Newsletter, which converts them into RSS feed entries. This approach provides both address obfuscation (many newsletter platforms block or restrict the Kill the Newsletter domain) and complete RSS-based content consumption.
Regulatory Framework and Legal Protections Against Email Tracking
The regulatory landscape surrounding email tracking has become increasingly strict, with major privacy regulations establishing explicit restrictions on tracking practices without consent.
GDPR and European Privacy Protections
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in effect across the European Union, email tracking is explicitly prohibited without express user consent. The GDPR Article 29 Working Party (now the European Data Protection Board) has stated “the strongest opposition to this processing because personal data about addressees’ behavior are recorded and transmitted without an unambiguous consent of a relevant addressee”. GDPR interpretation requires that tracking of email opens and clicks qualifies as personal data processing that requires explicit, informed consent obtained before any tracking occurs.
This regulation creates a significant compliance burden for email marketers operating in or communicating with European audiences. Companies must prove that they obtained unambiguous consent from recipients before implementing tracking pixels or tracking links. The consent must be specific, informed, and unambiguous; consent buried in terms of service or provided as a default opt-in does not satisfy GDPR requirements. Violations of these provisions carry severe penalties: fines up to twenty million euros or four percent of annual company turnover, whichever is higher.
Evolving Privacy Protections Beyond Europe
While GDPR represents the most stringent existing privacy regulation, privacy protections surrounding email tracking are becoming increasingly strict globally. Canada, Australia, and multiple U.S. states have implemented or are considering privacy legislation modeled on GDPR principles. In the United States alone, roughly three hundred fifty consumer privacy bills were considered or introduced in 2023, with eight additional states enacting comprehensive consumer privacy laws in 2023, compared to only five states with such laws before 2023. This represents a significant acceleration in privacy regulation momentum.
Apple’s Mail Privacy Protection and Link Tracking Protection initiatives represent a form of privacy protection implemented through platform design rather than regulatory requirement, but they demonstrate that privacy protections against email tracking are becoming more comprehensive across the digital infrastructure. As privacy regulations become more stringent and privacy expectations increase among consumers and regulators, email tracking infrastructure is likely to face increasing pressure and restrictions.
The Environmental Context: Why RSS Matters in the Broader Privacy Ecosystem
The resurgence of interest in RSS feeds, despite decades of predictions that RSS was dying, reflects broader trends in how individuals think about their relationship to digital platforms and content consumption. RSS represents a fundamentally different relationship between content consumers and producers compared to algorithmic, tracking-based platforms.
Decentralization and User Agency in Content Selection
RSS feeds return agency to users regarding content selection in a way that algorithmic platforms do not. With algorithmic platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, the platform’s algorithm determines what content each user sees, based on engagement metrics, predictions about what will keep users on the platform longest, and advertiser preferences. This algorithm-determined feed functions as a form of invisible curation that filters information without the user’s knowledge or control. RSS, by contrast, allows users to decide explicitly which feeds to subscribe to, and users see all content from those feeds in chronological order without algorithmic filtering. This represents a return to individual user agency in determining what information they consume.
This distinction has become particularly important in light of growing concern about filter bubbles and algorithmic amplification of polarizing or misleading content. With RSS, users can subscribe to feeds from diverse perspectives and sources without algorithmic filtering determining which perspectives they see. This enables a more deliberate, intentional approach to information consumption compared to the passive algorithmic filtering of social media feeds.
Open Standards and Resistance to Platform Lock-In
The open nature of RSS represents resistance to platform lock-in and corporate control over information infrastructure. RSS is an open standard that any individual or organization can implement; no single company controls RSS or can unilaterally change how it functions. This contrasts sharply with proprietary social media platforms where individual companies control the technology, can change how content is distributed with no warning to users or publishers, and can unilaterally remove content or users according to their business interests.
Feed publishers can switch between RSS hosting providers or host their own feeds without losing their audience, because users access feeds through their RSS reader of choice rather than through a single platform’s proprietary application. This portability and interoperability make RSS resistant to the network effects and lock-in dynamics that characterize centralized platforms. An individual newsletter creator using RSS can easily move their feed between hosting providers or to self-hosted infrastructure without subscribers needing to update their subscription addresses.
Best Practices and Recommendations for Tracking-Light Content Consumption
Based on the comprehensive analysis of RSS feeds, email newsletters, tracking mechanisms, and privacy-protecting tools, several practical recommendations emerge for individuals and organizations seeking to maintain privacy while staying informed.
For Content Consumers Seeking Privacy
Individuals seeking to consume content while maintaining maximum privacy should prioritize RSS-based content consumption over email newsletters. For publishers who offer RSS feeds, subscribing through an RSS reader rather than through email newsletters eliminates all email tracking exposure at the distribution layer. For publishers who do not offer RSS feeds but primarily distribute through email, users can implement workflow using Kill the Newsletter and SimpleLogin to convert email newsletters into RSS feed entries. This approach consolidates all content reading within a single RSS reader where all activity remains private and the user maintains complete control.
For users accessing RSS feeds through hosted services, Feedbin represents a reasonable compromise between privacy and convenience, offering strong privacy protections while providing a polished user interface. For users willing to engage with technical configuration, self-hosting an RSS reader such as FreshRSS or Miniflux provides maximum privacy while remaining accessible to individual users.
For unavoidable email newsletter subscriptions, users should utilize email services that provide tracking protection. Proton Mail offers comprehensive, default-enabled tracking protection across all devices. Users of Gmail or other mainstream email providers should install tracking-blocking browser extensions like Ugly Email on their desktop browsers, recognizing that this provides no protection on mobile devices and requires ongoing extension maintenance.
For Content Publishers and Email Senders
Publishers and organizations sending emails should evaluate their ethical obligations regarding subscriber privacy and consider implementing privacy-protective practices even where not legally required. The increasing regulatory emphasis on privacy, demonstrated by GDPR enforcement and expanding state-level privacy legislation, suggests that current tracking practices may face legal restrictions in the future. Publishers preparing for this regulatory evolution would benefit from implementing privacy protections proactively.
For publishers seeking to build direct audience relationships while respecting privacy, RSS feeds offer advantages over email newsletters. An RSS feed requires zero personal information from subscribers and enables anonymous content consumption. Publishers can implement RSS feeds alongside email newsletters to provide subscribers with a choice of consumption method, recognizing that some subscribers prefer privacy-protective RSS while others prefer the push notifications of email.
Publishers currently using email newsletters for audience building should evaluate privacy-focused email platforms like Buttondown that enable subscribers to opt out of tracking entirely. Even for publishers using mainstream platforms with unavoidable tracking infrastructure, explicitly communicating to subscribers that tracking is occurring and enabling subscribers to disable tracking where technically feasible represents an ethical minimum standard.
Organizational Approaches to Privacy-First Communication
Organizations and internal communications teams should recognize that email tracking within internal organizational communications raises serious ethical questions about workplace privacy and employee trust. Organizations implementing internal email tracking without explicit employee consent engage in silent workplace surveillance that undermines trust and may violate employee privacy expectations. Organizations seeking to build high-trust cultures should refrain from implementing tracking in internal communications.
For organizations seeking to provide their audience with privacy-respectful communication, implementing RSS feeds represents a meaningful gesture of respect for subscriber privacy. Organizations can implement RSS feeds through content management systems with minimal technical effort, and feeds can be generated automatically from existing content workflows. By offering RSS alongside email newsletters, organizations provide subscribers with a choice and position themselves as more privacy-conscious than competitors offering only tracked email newsletters.
Embracing the Tracking-Light Advantage
The landscape of content distribution and consumption has evolved to become increasingly tracked and surveilled, with email newsletters serving as vehicles for sophisticated tracking infrastructure that operates largely invisible to recipients. This tracking represents a fundamental shift in the relationship between publishers and audiences, transforming newsletters from communication mechanisms into data collection instruments. Over fifty percent of daily emails are tracked through invisible pixels and tracking links, with this surveillance enabling everything from behavioral profiling for targeted advertising to security threats like phishing preparation and doxxing attacks.
Against this backdrop of pervasive email tracking, RSS feeds and RSS readers represent a technology that embodies dramatically different values. RSS feeds are inherently anonymous, require no personal information for subscription, and technically cannot carry tracking mechanisms by design. This privacy arises not from policy decisions or user preference settings, but from the fundamental technical architecture of RSS as an open standard. For users seeking to consume content while maintaining privacy, RSS represents a vastly superior alternative to email newsletters.
The regulatory landscape continues to evolve toward stricter privacy protections, with GDPR establishing explicit restrictions on email tracking without consent, and numerous jurisdictions implementing or considering privacy legislation modeled on GDPR principles. This regulatory evolution suggests that current email tracking practices, while extremely common today, may become legally restricted or prohibited in the coming years. Organizations and individuals adapting their communication practices toward privacy protection in anticipation of this regulatory evolution position themselves favorably for the future digital environment.
The persistent vitality of RSS despite decades of predictions of its demise demonstrates that users value privacy, user agency, and open standards sufficiently to continue adopting RSS-based tools for content consumption. The resurgence of interest in RSS reflects not nostalgia for an earlier internet era, but rational preference for a technology that respects user privacy and provides meaningful user agency in content selection.
For individuals seeking to maintain privacy while staying informed, RSS feeds delivered through privacy-protective RSS readers represent the optimal technical approach. For publishers seeking to build sustainable audiences through direct relationships while respecting subscriber privacy, offering RSS feeds alongside email newsletters provides subscribers with meaningful choice. For organizations seeking to communicate with audiences in ways that build trust and respect privacy, implementing privacy-protective practices now positions them as leaders in an evolving landscape where privacy protection increasingly becomes not just an ethical preference but a competitive advantage and potential legal requirement.
The ad thwarting and tracker blocking ecosystem, understood broadly, encompasses not just technical tools that block tracking pixels but also architectural choices about which distribution technologies to employ. RSS represents not a technical tool for blocking tracking, but rather a fundamental choice to use a distribution technology that never incorporated tracking in the first place. In this sense, the most effective approach to avoiding email tracking is not installing browser extensions to block tracking in email newsletters, but rather adopting RSS for content consumption and, for those who must receive email newsletters, converting those emails into RSS feeds for reading through privacy-protective aggregators. This represents the most comprehensive solution to the problem of email tracking: not fighting against tracking infrastructure that was built into email by design, but rather choosing a fundamentally different technology that reflects different values about privacy, user agency, and the role of surveillance in digital communication.
Protect Your Digital Life with Activate Security
Get 14 powerful security tools in one comprehensive suite. VPN, antivirus, password manager, dark web monitoring, and more.
Get Protected Now
