Ransomware represents one of the most destructive and visually evident forms of cybersecurity threats that individuals and organizations encounter today. When a system becomes infected with ransomware, the manifestations are often unmistakable, ranging from dramatic screen takeovers to subtle file system modifications that reveal the presence of encryption-based attacks. Understanding what ransomware looks like—both in terms of its visual presentation to users and its behavioral signatures within computer systems—is essential for early detection and rapid response. This comprehensive report examines the diverse ways ransomware reveals itself to infected users, explores the various forms these manifestations take across different ransomware families, and provides detailed analysis of the observable characteristics that distinguish ransomware attacks from other types of malware infections. By understanding these visible indicators, system administrators, security professionals, and end users can recognize compromised systems more quickly and take appropriate action to minimize damage and potential financial loss from these devastating attacks.
The Visual Landscape of Ransomware: Screen-Based Presentations and User Interface Takeovers
When ransomware begins its attack sequence, one of the most immediately apparent manifestations users encounter involves dramatic changes to their visual interface. The ransomware experience typically culminates in highly visible screen presentations designed to convey urgency and compel payment. These presentations vary significantly depending on the ransomware family and its intended purpose, but they share the common goal of ensuring that infected users cannot miss the message that their system has been compromised. Screen locking pop-ups represent one of the most glaring signs of ransomware infection, where users suddenly see messages that lock them out of their computer and demand payment. These lock screens often cover the entire desktop environment, making it difficult or impossible for users to access their normal computing functions. The visual design of these screens is frequently professional-looking, incorporating elements such as official-sounding language, corporate logos, and urgent typography designed to intimidate users into quick compliance with ransom demands.
The presentation of ransom notes through screen overlays demonstrates significant sophistication in psychological manipulation. Many ransomware variants display countdown timers, which create artificial urgency by threatening to increase the ransom amount after a specified time period or to permanently delete encrypted files if payment is not received by a deadline. This tactic directly mirrors pressure tactics used in phishing attacks but with exponentially higher stakes, as the victim genuinely cannot access their data without intervention. Some lockers, as a particular category of ransomware, display full-screen windows designed to simulate official system lock screens, hiding the taskbar and disabling cursor movement to create the impression that the entire device has been locked by authorities or security systems. The visual authenticity of these displays is sometimes enhanced through the incorporation of official-looking imagery, such as law enforcement seals, government logos, or warnings that claim the user has violated laws and must pay fines to unlock their system.
Desktop wallpaper modifications represent another highly visible manifestation of certain ransomware families. Ransomware such as REvil, LockBit, and other sophisticated variants deliberately change the desktop background to display ransom notes and threat messaging. These wallpaper changes serve multiple purposes: they ensure that victims see the ransom demand every time they look at their desktop, they persist across application windows and sessions, and they demonstrate to victims that the attackers have achieved deep system-level access. The modification of wallpaper settings typically involves alterations to Windows registry keys controlling desktop appearance, which security solutions can detect through monitoring registry modification events. This behavior is so distinctive that security researchers and endpoint detection systems specifically monitor for wallpaper changes as an indicator of potential ransomware compromise. The presence of multiple ransom notes appearing simultaneously across the desktop, combined with wallpaper modifications, creates a comprehensive visual assault designed to ensure victims understand the severity of their situation immediately upon booting their systems.
File System Transformations: Extensions, Names, and Accessibility Changes
One of the most immediately recognizable aspects of ransomware infection involves observable changes to the user’s file system. When ransomware completes its encryption process, files display unusual or unfamiliar extensions that were not present before the infection. These file extensions serve multiple purposes: they identify which ransomware family conducted the encryption, they make files unrecognizable to standard operating system file associations, and they provide visual confirmation to both the attacker and the victim that encryption has occurred. Common ransomware file extensions include `.locked`, `.encrypted`, `.crypto`, `.zepto`, `.micro`, `.xyz`, `.zzz`, `.ecc`, `.aaa`, and numerous other variations. Some ransomware families employ random character sequences as extensions, making it difficult for users to recognize patterns across multiple encrypted files. For example, a file previously named `document.docx` might become `document.docx.locked` or `document.docx.[random_characters]`, immediately signaling to the user that something abnormal has occurred.
Beyond simple extension additions, some ransomware variants completely rename files or overwrite them entirely. Petya ransomware, for instance, operates differently from typical file-encrypting ransomware by targeting the Master Boot Record (MBT) and Master File Table (MFT) rather than individual files, making the entire drive essentially inaccessible even though individual file extensions may not change noticeably. This approach makes the system completely non-functional at the most fundamental level, preventing users from accessing anything on the drive. When users attempt to open files encrypted by ransomware, they receive error messages indicating that the files cannot be read or that the file format is unrecognizable. Windows users typically encounter messages stating that the system cannot open the file with the associated program, while Mac users see similar errors indicating file format incompatibility. These error messages, occurring repeatedly across numerous files that previously opened without issue, provide strong indicators that encryption has occurred across the system.
The speed and scale of file modification provides another observable characteristic of ransomware attacks. In many cases, thousands or tens of thousands of files become altered within a relatively short timeframe—often measured in minutes to hours depending on the volume of data and the speed of the encryption algorithm. Attentive users might notice that their file explorer displays files with unusual extensions, or they might observe that files they know they recently worked with now display dates showing they were modified at times they were not actively using their systems. The creation of new files alongside encrypted data represents another visible manifestation. Ransomware typically creates ransom note files in multiple locations throughout the file system, using names such as `README.txt`, `DECRYPT_INSTRUCTIONS.html`, `HOW_TO_RECOVER_FILES.txt`, or other variations designed to attract attention. These files contain instructions for contacting attackers, payment information, and threats regarding data deletion if ransom is not paid.
Accessibility and Functionality Loss: The User Experience of Encryption
Perhaps the most consequential visual aspect of ransomware infection is the user’s complete inability to access or use encrypted files. Files that won’t open represent one of the most tell-tale signs that ransomware has struck. Users attempting to access files essential to their work or personal lives suddenly find themselves completely unable to retrieve information they need. The complete data inaccessibility extends beyond simply being unable to open files; it affects all downstream processes that depend on that data. Businesses find themselves unable to access customer databases, financial records, or operational files necessary for business continuity. Individuals lose access to personal documents, photos, and other data they had stored on their systems. This functional loss creates enormous visible impact—systems that previously operated normally suddenly become significantly less useful or completely non-functional for critical tasks.
The scope of affected files extends to system backups and recovery mechanisms. Sophisticated ransomware specifically targets backup files and shadow copies—the automatic backup functionality built into modern operating systems. By deleting or encrypting these backup files, ransomware ensures that users cannot simply restore their files from recent backups, eliminating what would otherwise be the most straightforward recovery path. When users attempt to access their backup recovery options, they discover that these mechanisms have been disabled or that the backup files themselves have been encrypted. This comprehensive approach to eliminating recovery options transforms the user’s predicament from inconvenient to genuinely desperate, which explains why ransomware attacks result in such high financial losses and justify the high ransom demands.
Early Warning Signs: Subtle Manifestations Before Encryption Completes
While the most dramatic manifestations of ransomware occur after encryption completes, observant users or system administrators might notice earlier warning signs that suggest a compromise is in progress. Unusual network activity or high data usage represents one such early indicator. Ransomware operations often involve communication with command-and-control servers to retrieve encryption keys and, in modern double-extortion variants, exfiltration of sensitive data before encryption begins. Users with knowledge of their normal network patterns might notice unexpected spikes in network traffic, or they might observe that their internet connection seems unusually busy despite not actively using bandwidth-intensive applications. Intrusion prevention systems can detect these patterns through traffic analysis for anomalies, identifying unusual connections to unknown IP addresses or significant increases in data transfer volumes.
System performance degradation provides another observable characteristic of ransomware in operation. Slow system performance and unresponsiveness can occur as ransomware consumes substantial processing power during the encryption process, particularly when handling large volumes of data across network shares. Some ransomware strains are so resource-intensive that they can bring even powerful systems to a grinding halt. Users might experience extreme slowness in applications, delayed response to keyboard and mouse inputs, or system freezes that occur spontaneously. Additionally, certain ransomware variants cause frequent application crashes as they interfere with system files and processes in the course of their infection spread and encryption activities. Programs that previously ran smoothly suddenly become unstable, crashing without clear cause. These cumulative performance issues might alert security-conscious users to check their systems more closely before encryption completion.
Unexpected pop-ups or error messages that don’t match the user’s normal system experience can also signal early compromise. Some ransomware variants display warning messages as part of their initial infection stages, attempting to manipulate users into taking actions that facilitate the attack. These messages might claim to be from security software, system maintenance tools, or other official-sounding sources. Disabled security software represents a particularly telling early warning sign, as many ransomware variants attempt to disable or bypass antivirus and firewall protections to avoid detection and interference. Users who notice that their antivirus software has been turned off without their knowledge, or who find that firewall protections have been disabled, should be immediately suspicious that a compromise has occurred.
Protect Your Digital Life with Activate Security
Get 14 powerful security tools in one comprehensive suite. VPN, antivirus, password manager, dark web monitoring, and more.
Get Protected NowChanged file permissions preventing access to files before encryption occurs can also serve as an early indicator of compromise. As ransomware spreads and attempts to establish persistence within systems, it may modify file and folder permissions, leaving users unable to access files they should be able to access. Messages stating “access denied” for files the user normally has permission to access suggest that something has modified permissions maliciously. Failed login attempts from unknown locations represent another early warning sign, particularly in networked environments where system administrators can observe login patterns. When ransomware or attackers precede ransomware installation gain initial access through compromised credentials, they may attempt to log in from multiple unusual locations or at unusual times when the organization is not normally operating.
Ransom Notes: The Attacker’s Communication Strategy and Visual Presentation
The ransom note represents the attacker’s primary communication mechanism with their victim, and these notes display significant variation in format, content, and presentation across different ransomware families. Ransom notes typically appear as text files, HTML documents, or occasionally as on-screen popup windows, and they contain specific information designed to facilitate payment while maintaining attacker anonymity. The most common ransom note filenames follow patterns such as `README.txt`, `DECRYPT_INSTRUCTIONS.html`, `How_To_Recover_Files.txt`, `READ_ME_FIRST.txt`, or variations specific to particular ransomware families. For example, Ryuk ransomware writes its ransom note to a file named `RyukReadMe.txt`, while LockBit creates a file called `Restore-My-Files.txt`, and Hive ransomware uses `HOW_TO_DECRYPT.txt`.
The content of ransom notes contains several standard elements designed to convey the severity of the situation and facilitate contact between attacker and victim. Typically, ransom notes explain that the victim’s files have been encrypted and are inaccessible without a decryption key held only by the attacker. They provide specific payment amounts demanded, often adjusted based on factors such as organization size, industry, and perceived financial capacity to pay. Many ransom notes include countdown timers indicating when payment is due, with threats that failure to pay will result in permanent data deletion or release of sensitive information to the public or media. The notes provide contact information for victims to reach attackers, typically through email addresses hosted on anonymity-protecting services like ProtonMail or Tutanota, or through TOR-based websites where victims can communicate with attackers and negotiate payment.
Modern ransom notes often include proof of compromise—evidence that the attacker genuinely possesses the victim’s data and has not simply created a false scare. This might include displaying a sample of encrypted files, showing file listings or database entries, or providing other information the attacker could only possess if they genuinely accessed the victim’s systems. Some ransomware families are notably professional in their ransom note presentation. REvil ransomware, for instance, operates a sophisticated ransom site accessible through TOR where victims can log in with unique credentials provided in the ransom note, communicate directly with attackers through a chat interface, and receive specific payment instructions. This approach creates what amounts to a customer service experience for victims, complete with negotiation possibilities. Other ransomware families take a more minimalist approach, providing basic payment instructions and threats without the intermediary infrastructure.
The visual presentation of ransom notes demonstrates varying levels of sophistication. Some notes are simply plain text files with minimal formatting, while others incorporate HTML formatting, images, or attempt to emulate official system messages. Police-themed ransomware notes attempt to appear as if they originate from law enforcement agencies, claiming that illegal activity has been detected on the user’s system and that they must pay fines to avoid criminal prosecution. These notes sometimes incorporate official law enforcement imagery or language designed to frighten users into compliance. The psychological sophistication of ransom notes has evolved significantly over time, with modern variants employing messaging strategies designed to maximize the likelihood of payment while minimizing legal liability for the attackers.
Mobile Ransomware Manifestations: Unique Characteristics on Mobile Devices
Ransomware affecting mobile devices displays somewhat different visual characteristics compared to desktop and server ransomware, reflecting the different interface paradigms and capabilities of mobile operating systems. Screen lockers on mobile devices present one of the most common manifestations, where the ransomware displays a full-screen overlay that prevents access to the device while displaying a ransom demand. Unlike desktop systems where users might potentially force-quit applications or access system management tools, mobile ransomware can leverage the permission system and notifications to create persistent screen locks that are extremely difficult to dismiss. Some mobile ransomware, such as AndroidOS.MalLocker.B, exploits Android functionality by using high-priority call notifications and manipulating the onUserLeaveHint() callback to ensure that ransom note screens reappear whenever users attempt to access other applications or press the home button.
Mobile ransomware sometimes takes a different approach from encryption-based attacks, instead focusing on device lockdown through PIN or pattern changes. DoubleLocker, which emerged in 2017, encrypted files in a device’s storage directory but also changed the device’s PIN code to prevent access to the device itself. This combined approach prevents users from even unlocking their phones, in addition to making their stored files inaccessible. The presence of ransom demand screens that persist across app interactions, combined with the inability to unlock the device normally, creates a particularly severe user experience where the device becomes essentially unusable.
Mobile ransomware also sometimes displays alerts that mimic legitimate security warnings or system notifications. These deceptive alerts claim that the device has been compromised with malware and direct users to install fake security software or make payments to resolve the supposed threat. The notifications exploit users’ trust in mobile platforms and their lesser familiarity with mobile security threats compared to desktop threats. SMS-based ransomware leverages text messaging to distribute malicious links that, when clicked, install ransomware on the device, with the ransomware then displaying ransom notes and demands for payment.
Behavioral Signatures and System-Level Manifestations
Beyond visual indicators users can directly observe, ransomware produces numerous system-level behavioral signatures that security monitoring tools and experienced system administrators can detect. Disabled or removed security software represents one of the most significant behavioral manifestations, as ransomware frequently attempts to disable antivirus software, firewalls, and other security solutions to avoid detection and interference with its operations. This behavior can be observed through monitoring of processes that terminate security software, through registry changes that disable security services, or through removal of antivirus files. Some ransomware variants execute batch files or PowerShell scripts explicitly designed to disable Windows Defender or other installed security products.
The deletion of shadow copies and system backups represents another critical behavioral signature. Ransomware deliberately seeks out and deletes Windows shadow copies—the automatic backup functionality that allows system restore—to eliminate easy recovery paths for victims. This behavior can be detected through monitoring for the execution of vssadmin.exe with parameters designed to delete shadow copies, or through observing the absence of shadow copies that should normally exist on systems. The execution of commands designed to prevent system recovery and disable recovery mechanisms demonstrates the deliberate nature of ransomware attacks; attackers specifically target recovery mechanisms they know victims might use to recover their data without paying ransom.
Deletion or modification of event logs represents another significant behavioral signature. Many ransomware variants attempt to clear Windows event logs to remove evidence of their activities and make forensic investigation more difficult. The clearing of System, Setup, Security, and Application event logs can be detected through monitoring for the execution of commands like `wevtutil cl` or through observing suspicious gaps in event logging where expected events are missing. Modification of the Master Boot Record (MBR) and Master File Table (MFT) represents perhaps the most dramatic system-level manifestation, occurring with ransomware like Petya and NotPetya that encrypt these critical system structures rather than individual user files. This modification renders systems completely unbootable, replacing the normal boot process with encryption routines that demand ransom before allowing the system to boot.
The behavior of creating and executing various scripts and batch files to perform malicious activities represents another observable signature. Ransomware frequently creates temporary batch files designed to perform cleanup tasks, disable security software, delete recovery mechanisms, and establish persistence. The presence of suspicious batch files with names like `disableAV.bat`, temporary PowerShell scripts with suspicious content, or VBS scripts executing in contexts where they would not normally execute all indicate potential compromise. The behavior of MBR and VBR sector destruction, observed in some ransomware variants, involves overwriting critical disk structures that prevent normal system operation independent of file encryption.
Ransomware Family-Specific Manifestations: Notable Examples and Variations
Different ransomware families display distinctive visual and behavioral characteristics that allow security researchers to differentiate between infections. Petya ransomware, first discovered in 2016, produces one of the most visually distinctive manifestations of any ransomware family: an iconic red skull and crossbones image displayed on a black background before showing the ransom note. This distinctive image has become so associated with Petya that skull and crossbones imagery on computer screens has become roughly synonymous with ransomware infection in popular imagination. Petya’s ransom note demands $300 USD and appears after the distinctive skull image, making Petya infections immediately recognizable. Petya also overrides the normal Windows boot process, replacing standard startup with custom kernel code that encrypts the MFT and MBR, a behavior that makes Petya-infected systems completely non-functional until decryption occurs or recovery methods are employed.
WannaCry, which affected over 300,000 computers across 150 countries in May 2017, displays ransom notes with specific formatting and payment instructions, though its most notorious aspect was its rapid spread through networks rather than its unique visual presentation. WannaCry victims see ransom demands for Bitcoin payment and instructions for accessing a TOR-based payment portal. REvil ransomware demonstrates the sophistication of modern ransomware infrastructure through its comprehensive ransom website accessible through TOR, complete with victim chat support, payment tracking, and countdown timers for data release. REvil also modifies desktop wallpapers to display ransom messages with embedded threats and payment deadlines.
Ryuk ransomware, specifically designed to target enterprise environments, generates ransom demands calculated based on victim organization size and perceived ability to pay, ranging from 1.7 BTC to 99 BTC in observed cases, resulting in payouts of millions of dollars. Ryuk creates ransom notes with variable content but consistent structure, and maintains TOR-based payment portals and data leak sites where stolen data is published if payment is refused. LockBit ransomware, one of the most active and destructive variants in recent years, appends the `.lockbit` extension to encrypted files and changes file icons to display the LockBit logo, making infected files immediately visually distinctive. LockBit also modifies desktop wallpapers and implements extensive lateral movement capabilities that allow rapid encryption of entire networks.
Hive ransomware demonstrates the evolution of ransomware toward specialized targeting of healthcare and critical infrastructure organizations. Hive adds randomized character extensions to encrypted files (`.hive` plus random characters) and creates detailed ransom notes with victim-specific login credentials for accessing attacker chat infrastructure. Double and triple extortion ransomware variants layer additional threats beyond simple encryption, threatening to leak stolen data, launch DDoS attacks, or contact victims’ business partners and customers with ransom demands to amplify pressure on victims. The visual manifestation of these attacks includes not just encrypted files but data leak site pages showing samples of stolen data and countdown timers for complete data release, adding an additional dimension to the visible evidence of compromise.
Network-Based Manifestations: Observable Communication and Spread Patterns
While ransomware’s visual impact on infected systems is dramatic, its behavior across networks produces observable patterns that network security tools can detect. Ransomware frequently communicates with command-and-control servers to retrieve encryption keys, receive operational instructions, and report on infection progress. These communications to external servers, often routed through TOR or proxy services for anonymity, can be detected through network traffic analysis. Intrusion prevention systems can identify unusual connections to known malicious IP addresses, connections to multiple suspicious hosts, or traffic patterns inconsistent with normal business operations. The behavior of ransomware attempting to identify and encrypt network shares represents another observable network-level manifestation. Ransomware attempts to encrypt files not only on the local system but also on any network-accessible file shares, network drives, and cloud storage accessible through the compromised system.
The spread of ransomware across networks through techniques like SMB exploitation and lateral movement can be observed through network traffic monitoring. Ransomware variants like NotPetya use the EternalBlue exploit to spread from system to system through network connections, creating observable network traffic patterns associated with exploitation attempts. The execution of tools like PsExec, which ransomware uses to execute itself on remote systems, creates observable process execution patterns and network connections that endpoint detection systems can flag. The behavior of ransomware attempting to establish persistence through creating scheduled tasks, modifying registry run keys, or installing services creates system-level artifacts that can be detected through monitoring of system configuration changes and process execution patterns.
Detection Methods and Visual Diagnostic Approaches
Security professionals and sophisticated users can employ several methods to visually diagnose and confirm ransomware infections. File extension monitoring represents one of the simplest diagnostic approaches; the appearance of unknown or unusual file extensions across large portions of the file system constitutes nearly conclusive evidence of ransomware activity. Comparing current file listings with file explorer history or screenshots from before suspected infection can reveal the systematic replacement of known extensions with unknown ones. The systematic appearance of ransom notes in multiple folders and locations throughout the file system provides strong evidence of ransomware infection, particularly when coupled with files displaying unusual extensions.
Desktop wallpaper modifications combined with ransom notes displayed as desktop backgrounds represent highly specific indicators of certain ransomware families. The presence of desktop wallpapers showing ransom messages and payment threats is virtually diagnostic of ransomware infection, particularly sophisticated variants like REvil or LockBit. System performance analysis can reveal the characteristics of active ransomware operations; rapid increases in disk I/O activity combined with encryption-related processes using high CPU percentages indicate active encryption in progress. The observation of deleted shadow copies and disabled recovery mechanisms, through checking system properties for availability of restore points, indicates that something has deliberately removed recovery mechanisms—a specific signature of ransomware rather than accidental data loss.
The presence of suspicious processes executing with elevated privileges, combined with file encryption activity, provides strong evidence of ransomware. Security tools can monitor for processes creating large numbers of encrypted files, processes with network connections combined with file encryption operations, or processes executing with privileges they should not possess. The modification of registry keys related to security settings, autorun locations, or desktop settings, combined with visual changes to the desktop environment, indicates deliberate system modification of the type associated with ransomware rather than normal user activities.
The Psychological Dimensions of Ransomware’s Visual Presentation
The visual presentation of ransomware represents far more than simply technical display of information; it embodies carefully designed psychological manipulation intended to maximize the likelihood of ransom payment. The urgency-inducing countdown timers displayed on ransom screens exploit time pressure psychology, creating artificial scarcity that encourages rapid decision-making without careful thought. Users viewing countdown timers showing hours remaining before data deletion or ransom increases are more likely to attempt immediate payment than users given unlimited time to consider their options. The threatening language and fear-based messaging in ransom notes deliberately attempts to induce panic and desperation that overrides rational consideration of alternatives like data recovery or law enforcement involvement.
The professional appearance and official-looking design of many ransom notes and lock screens attempts to exploit users’ tendency to trust professional-appearing information. Some ransom notes incorporate official corporate logos, government seals, or law enforcement imagery to create false legitimacy. The display of apparent proof of compromise—showing file names, database entries, or other victim-specific information—creates psychological certainty that the attacker genuinely possesses the victim’s data and has not simply created a generic scare tactic. This psychological impact pushes victims toward believing that payment represents their only option for data recovery.
Ransomware Revealed: A Final Word
Ransomware produces numerous visual, behavioral, and system-level manifestations that allow infected users and security professionals to recognize compromise and initiate appropriate response. The distinctive visual presentations—from dramatic screen takeovers and desktop wallpaper modifications to distinctive ransom notes and error messages—serve the dual purpose of terrifying victims into compliance and proving to attackers that they have successfully compromised their targets. The file system changes, from unusual file extensions to inaccessible files and the appearance of ransom note files in multiple locations, provide clear evidence of systematic encryption activity. The system-level behavioral signatures, from disabled security software to deleted recovery mechanisms and modified system structures, demonstrate the deliberate and comprehensive nature of ransomware attacks.
Understanding what ransomware looks like—both in its immediate visual presentation and in its deeper system-level manifestations—enables faster detection and more appropriate response. Individuals who recognize unusual file extensions, distinctive error messages, and ransom notes can isolate infected systems and contact appropriate recovery and law enforcement resources. Organizations that monitor for behavioral signatures like security software disabling, shadow copy deletion, and suspicious process execution can detect ransomware in progress and potentially halt encryption before all data becomes encrypted. The visual and behavioral characteristics of ransomware make it simultaneously one of the most obvious and most serious threats in the contemporary threat landscape; its obvious manifestations ensure that victims immediately understand they have been attacked, while its deliberate targeting of recovery mechanisms and comprehensive encryption ensure that the attack’s impact is nearly impossible to remediate without expert assistance or ransom payment. By maintaining awareness of these manifestations and implementing comprehensive monitoring and detection systems, organizations and individuals can improve their chances of detecting and responding to ransomware threats before maximum damage occurs.
